Exploring Quantum Reversibility with Young Learners
- 7 August 2020
- conference paper
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Abstract
Quantum computing is poised to revolutionize some critical intractable computing problems; but to fully take advantage of this computation, computer scientists will need to learn to program in a new way, with new constraints. The challenge in developing a quantum computing curriculum for younger learners is that two dominant approaches, teaching via the underlying quantum physical phenomenon or the mathematical operations that emerge from those phenomenon, require extensive technical knowledge. Our goal is to extract some of the essential insights in the principles of quantum computing and present them in contexts that a broad audience can understand. In this study, we explore how to teach the concept of quantum reversibility. Our interdisciplinary science, science education, computer science education, and computer science team is co-creating quantum computing (QC) learning trajectories (LT), educational materials, and activities for young learners. We present a draft LT for reversibility, the materials that both influenced it and were influenced by it, as well as an analysis of student work and a revised LT. We find that for clear cases, many 8-9 year old students understand reversibility in ways that align with quantum computation. However, when there are less clear-cut cases, students show a level of sophistication in their argumentation that aligns with the rules of reversibility for quantum computing even when their decisions do not match. In particular, students did not utilize the idea of a closed system, analyzing the effects to every item in the system. This blurred the distinction between between reversing (undoing) an action, recycling to reproduce identical items with some of the same materials, or replacing used items with new ones. In addition, some students allowed for not restoring all aspects of the original items, just the ones critical to their core functionality. We then present a revised learning trajectory that incorporates these concepts.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (1730449 and 1730088)
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Programming languages and compiler design for realistic quantum hardwareNature, 2017
- K-8 Learning Trajectories Derived from Research LiteraturePublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2017
- Learning trajectories: a framework for connecting standards with curriculumZdm-Mathematics Education, 2014
- Modeling the learning progressions of computational thinking of primary grade studentsPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2013
- Evaluation of a learning trajectory for length in the early yearsZdm-Mathematics Education, 2011
- Recognizing computational thinking patternsPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2011
- Why haven't more quantum algorithms been found?Journal of the ACM, 2003
- Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum ComputerSIAM Journal on Computing, 1997
- A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database searchPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1996
- Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist PerspectiveJournal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1995