Conflicts of interest and Scientific Societies
- 16 April 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Neurological Sciences
- Vol. 41 (8), 2095-2102
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04330-8
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to bring attention to the complex issue of conflicts of interest (COIs) from the point of view of Scientific Societies and their responsibility in managing secondary interests possibly undermining their activities such as improvement of professional quality, research promotion, and development of guidelines. The first publication on the issue of COIs dates back to more than a century, but only in the last decades the related ethical and legal problems have received public and professional attention. The growing role of industry in biomedical research, the significant decrease in public contributions to health, care, training, and research, and the involvement of physicians in industry-funded research have obliged to study how to identify and manage COIs. The Bioethics and Palliative Care Study Group of the Italian Neurological Society addressed the issue with a specific focus on Scientific Societies that, in our opinion, should also set an example for individual practice, raising awareness among their associates on COIs and implementing strategies for their identification and management. The paper is focused on the nature of the COI, why and how it could be managed, which policies can be implemented, and which kind of action should be considered by Scientific Societies. We emphasize the role of Scientific Societies in fostering knowledge and awareness of conflicts of interest through training and continuing education.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uniqueness, Exploitation, and Relative Risk Standards in Adolescent ResearchAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2011
- Domain expertise insulates against judgment bias by monetary favors through a modulation of ventromedial prefrontal cortexProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Review of David Perlman, R. Smith, and R. Cha,Bioethics 2.0 Podcasts E4–Eclipse Ethics Education EnterprisesAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2011
- Knowledge of ghostwriting and financial conflicts-of-interest reduces the perceived credibility of biomedical researchBMC Research Notes, 2011
- Clarifying Conflict of InterestAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2011
- The Vexing Problem of Guidelines and Conflict of Interest: A Potential SolutionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Association between industry affiliation and position on cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone: cross sectional systematic reviewBMJ, 2010
- We want raw data, nowBMJ, 2009
- Conflict of interest in education and patient carePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2008
- What have we learnt from Vioxx?BMJ, 2007