LIMITS OF DISCOURSE: EXAMPLES FROM POLITICAL, ACADEMIC, AND HUMAN-AGENT INTERACTION
Open Access
- 29 December 2020
- journal article
- Published by Masaryk University Press in Discourse and Interaction
- Vol. 13 (2), 89-118
- https://doi.org/10.5817/di2020-2-89
Abstract
This contribution looks at modern discourse from two perspectives. It tries to show that the term ‘discourse’ has been expanded over the last few decades to include more phenomena and more disciplines that use it as a basis for their analyses. But it also tries to show that discourse in the sense of effective interaction has met its limits. The fundamental question is: When is discourse real discourse, i.e. more than a series of unrelated utterances and when is it coherent interactive communication? This paper does not intend to provide a new overall theoretical-methodological model, it uses examples from political discourse to demonstrate that popular discourse is often unfortunately less interactive than seems necessary, examples from academic discourse to illustrate that community conventions are being standardised more and more, and from humanoid-human discourse to argue that it is still difficult to construct agents that are recognised as discourse partners by human beings. Theoretical approaches to discuss these limits of discourse include coherence andintentionality. They can be applied to show where lack of cohesion in discourse indicates lack of cohesion in society.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2016
- Social Linguistics and LiteraciesPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2015
- Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaningProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014
- USING EYE-TRACKING TO INVESTIGATE TOPICS IN L2 ACQUISITION AND L2 PROCESSINGStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 2013
- A Meta-Analytical Review of Teacher Credibility and its Associations with Teacher Behaviors and Student OutcomesCommunication Education, 2009
- A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corporaEnglish for Specific Purposes, 2006
- Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1998
- Towards an anatomy of impolitenessJournal of Pragmatics, 1996
- Believing, causing, intending: The basis for a hierarchy of sign concepts in the reconstruction of communicationPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1993
- IntentionalityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1983