A Promising Wearable Solution for the Practical and Accurate Monitoring of Low Back Loading in Manual Material Handling
Open Access
- 6 January 2021
- Vol. 21 (2), 340
- https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020340
Abstract
(1) Background: Low back disorders are a leading cause of missed work and physical disability in manual material handling due to repetitive lumbar loading and overexertion. Ergonomic assessments are often performed to understand and mitigate the risk of musculoskeletal overexertion injuries. Wearable sensor solutions for monitoring low back loading have the potential to improve the quality, quantity, and efficiency of ergonomic assessments and to expand opportunities for the personalized, continuous monitoring of overexertion injury risk. However, existing wearable solutions using a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) are limited in how accurately they can estimate back loading when objects of varying mass are handled, and alternative solutions in the scientific literature require so many distributed sensors that they are impractical for widespread workplace implementation. We therefore explored new ways to accurately monitor low back loading using a small number of wearable sensors. (2) Methods: We synchronously collected data from laboratory instrumentation and wearable sensors to analyze 10 individuals each performing about 400 different material handling tasks. We explored dozens of candidate solutions that used IMUs on various body locations and/or pressure insoles. (3) Results: We found that the two key sensors for accurately monitoring low back loading are a trunk IMU and pressure insoles. Using signals from these two sensors together with a Gradient Boosted Decision Tree algorithm has the potential to provide a practical (relatively few sensors), accurate (up to r2 = 0.89), and automated way (using wearables) to monitor time series lumbar moments across a broad range of material handling tasks. The trunk IMU could be replaced by thigh IMUs, or a pelvis IMU, without sacrificing much accuracy, but there was no practical substitute for the pressure insoles. The key to realizing accurate lumbar load estimates with this approach in the real world will be optimizing force estimates from pressure insoles. (4) Conclusions: Here, we present a promising wearable solution for the practical, automated, and accurate monitoring of low back loading during manual material handling.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (R01EB028105)
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of a novel wearable solution for measuring L5/S1 load during manual material handling tasksPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2020
- Validation of a wearable system for 3D ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment during manual lifting using instrumented shoes and an inertial sensor suitJournal of Biomechanics, 2020
- Estimation of Spinal Loading During Manual Materials Handling Using Inertial Motion CaptureAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2020
- Prevalence, Recognition of Work-Relatedness, and Effect on Work of Low Back Pain Among U.S. WorkersAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2019
- Modeling Overuse Injuries in Sport as a Mechanical Fatigue PhenomenonExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 2018
- Estimating the L5S1 flexion/extension moment in symmetrical lifting using a simplified ambulatory measurement systemJournal of Biomechanics, 2018
- Development and validation of an easy-to-use risk assessment tool for cumulative low back loading: The Lifting Fatigue Failure Tool (LiFFT)Applied Ergonomics, 2017
- Low Back Pain Prevalence and Related Workplace Psychosocial Risk Factors: A Study Using Data From the 2010 National Health Interview SurveyJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2016
- Musculoskeletal disorders as a fatigue failure process: evidence, implications and research needsErgonomics, 2016
- New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equationErgonomics, 2007