“Universal Warming” protocol for vitrified oocytes to streamline cell exchange for transnational donation programs: a multi-center study
- 3 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
- Vol. 37 (6), 1379-1385
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01798-3
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the clinical efficacy of a “Universal Warming” protocol, based on subsequent steps with 1 M and 0.5 M concentration of extracellular cryoprotectant (ECCP), on shipped oocytes. Oocytes are vitrified using different brands of ready-to-use kits which recommend that the use of their own warming kit and combining different vitrification/warming kits may have legal consequences for assisted reproductive (AR) centers, until this practice has been validated with clinical studies. Methods Retrospective multi-center transnational observational study. Number of oocytes warmed 1.898. Vitrification performed with vitrification kit (Kitazato, Japan); warming carried out randomly with two different kits: Kitazato warming kit and Vit Kit®-Thaw (FujiFilm Irvine, USA). Warmed oocytes were assigned to 2 groups: KK (Kitazato/Kitazato) 939, and KI (Kitazato/Irvine) 959. Primary endpoint: survival rate. Secondary endpoints: fertilization rate; blastulation rate; implantation rate; live birth rate. Results Survival was comparable between the groups: 84.6% (795/939) in group KK vs 82.1% (787/959) in group KI. Fertilization rate was lower (P = 0.027) in group KK (75.7%—602/795) than in group KI (80.4%—633/787). Blastulation and implantation and live birth rates were all statistically comparable between the study groups: blastulation rate was 58.5% (352/602) vs 57.8% (366/633); implantation rate was 41.5% (80/193) vs 45.9% (84/183); live birth rate was 52.5% (62/118) in KK and 45.0% (54/120) in KI. Conclusion The use of this “Universal Warming” protocol simplifies vitrified oocyte exchange between AR centers in different countries, and overcomes potential regulatory/commercial/availability differences affecting clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid warming increases survival of slow-frozen sibling oocytes: a step towards a single warming procedure irrespective of the freezing protocol?Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2014
- A reliable procedure for decontamination before thawing of human specimens cryostored in liquid nitrogen: three washes with sterile liquid nitrogen (SLN2)Fertility and Sterility, 2012
- The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meetingReproductive BioMedicine Online, 2012
- A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryosHuman Reproduction Update, 2012
- Efficiency of aseptic open vitrification and hermetical cryostorage of human oocytesReproductive BioMedicine Online, 2011
- Nitrogen vapor shipment of vitrified oocytes: time for cautionFertility and Sterility, 2011
- Sterilization of liquid nitrogen with ultraviolet irradiation for safe vitrification of human oocytes or embryosFertility and Sterility, 2010
- Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trialHuman Reproduction, 2010
- Freezing within 2 h from oocyte retrieval increases the efficiency of human oocyte cryopreservation when using a slow freezing/rapid thawing protocol with high sucrose concentrationHuman Reproduction, 2008
- Trehalose and anhydrobiosis in tardigrades – evidence for divergence in responses to dehydrationThe FEBS Journal, 2007