Nasal high flow higher than 60 L/min in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a physiological study
Open Access
- 23 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Critical Care
- Vol. 24 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03344-0
Abstract
Nasal high flow delivered at flow rates higher than 60 L/min in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure might be associated with improved physiological effects. However, poor comfort might limit feasibility of its clinical use. We performed a prospective randomized cross-over physiological study on 12 ICU patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Patients underwent three steps at the following gas flow: 0.5 L/kg PBW/min, 1 L/kg PBW/min, and 1.5 L/kg PBW/min in random order for 20 min. Temperature and FiO2 remained unchanged. Toward the end of each phase, we collected arterial blood gases, lung volumes, and regional distribution of ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT), and comfort. In five patients, the etiology was pulmonary; infective disease characterized seven patients; median PaO2/FiO2 at enrollment was 213 [IQR 136–232]. The range of flow rate during NHF 1.5 was 75–120 L/min. PaO2/FiO2 increased with flow, albeit non significantly (p = 0.064), PaCO2 and arterial pH remained stable (p = 0.108 and p = 0.105). Respiratory rate decreased at higher flow rates (p = 0.014). Inhomogeneity of ventilation decreased significantly at higher flows (p = 0.004) and lung volume at end-expiration significantly increased (p = 0.007), but mostly in the non-dependent regions. Comfort was significantly poorer during the step performed at the highest flow (p < 0.001). NHF delivered at rates higher than 60 L/min in critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is associated with reduced respiratory rate, increased lung homogeneity, and additional positive pressure effect, but also with worse comfort.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (Ricerca Corrente 2020)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of high flow nasal cannula for preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation during intubationAnnals of Translational Medicine, 2019
- Increasing support by nasal high flow acutely modifies the ROX index in hypoxemic patients: A physiologic studyJournal of Critical Care, 2019
- The effect of high-flow nasal cannula in reducing the mortality and the rate of endotracheal intubation when used before mechanical ventilation compared with conventional oxygen therapy and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. A systematic review and meta-analysisThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2018
- Not Just Oxygen? Mechanisms of Benefit from High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypoxemic Respiratory FailureAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017
- Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory FailureAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017
- High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: an observational cohort studyAnnals of Intensive Care, 2016
- Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Thoraco-Abdominal Synchrony in Adult Critically Ill PatientsRespiratory Care, 2013
- Outcome of reintubated patients after scheduled extubationJournal of Critical Care, 2011
- Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot studyIntensive Care Medicine, 2011
- Acute lung injury augments hypoxic ventilatory response in the absence of systemic hypoxemiaJournal of Applied Physiology, 2006