Evaluating the Effect of Stimuli Color and Frequency on SSVEP
Open Access
- 27 December 2020
- Vol. 21 (1), 117
- https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010117
Abstract
Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) can extract information about the subject’s intentions by registering and processing electroencephalographic (EEG) signals to generate actions on physical systems. Steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEP) are produced when the subject stares at flashing visual stimuli. By means of spectral analysis and by measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of its harmonic contents, the observed stimulus can be identified. Stimulus color matters, and some authors have proposed red because of its ability to capture attention, while others refuse it because it might induce epileptic seizures. Green has also been proposed and it is claimed that white may generate the best signals. Regarding frequency, middle frequencies are claimed to produce the best SNR, although high frequencies have not been thoroughly studied, and might be advantageous due to the lower spontaneous cerebral activity in this frequency band. Here, we show white, red, and green stimuli, at three frequencies: 5 (low), 12 (middle), and 30 (high) Hz to 42 subjects, and compare them in order to find which one can produce the best SNR. We aim to know if the response to white is as strong as the one to red, and also if the response to high frequency is as strong as the one triggered by lower frequencies. Attention has been measured with the Conner’s Continuous Performance Task version 2 (CPT-II) task, in order to search for a potential relationship between attentional capacity and the SNR previously obtained. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows the best SNR with the middle frequency, followed by the low, and finally the high one. White gives as good an SNR as red at 12 Hz and so does green at 5 Hz, with no differences at 30 Hz. These results suggest that middle frequencies are preferable and that using the red color can be avoided. Correlation analysis also show a correlation between attention and the SNR at low frequency, so suggesting that for the low frequencies, more attentional capacity leads to better results.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Brain–computer interfacesHandbook of Clinical Neurology, 2013
- Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and ControlCommunications of the ACM, 2011
- Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectivesProgress in Neurobiology, 2010
- A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIsComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2010
- Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs): Detection instead of classificationJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 2008
- A practical VEP-based brain-computer interfaceIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2006
- Steady-State VEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface Control in an Immersive 3D Gaming EnvironmentEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2005
- Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: impact of harmonic frequency componentsJournal of Neural Engineering, 2005
- The role of attention in visual processing.Philosophical Transactions B, 2002
- The Effect of Task Relevance on the Cortical Response to Changes in Visual and Auditory Stimuli: An Event-Related fMRI StudyNeuroImage, 2001