The intraoperative use of a calliper predicts leg length and offset after total hip arthroplasty. Component subsidence influences the leg length
Open Access
- 3 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Vol. 16 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02559-3
Abstract
Background The purpose of total hip arthroplasty (THA) post-surgery and proper physiotherapy is positive recovery for the patient. Consideration is given to hip replacement biomechanics by ensuring no discrepancies in limb length (LL) and a stable prosthesis. Therefore, the patient must have proper preoperative planning and communication and a clear understanding of what to expect. Methods A prospective series of 59 THA operated by a single surgeon via Hardinge approach was studied, using an intraoperative calliper (CAL) to predict the change of LL and offset. We compared the results of the intraoperative changes before and after THA implantation with the reference of these values on anteroposterior x-ray pelvis. The importance of leg length balance and a good offset restoration is questioned, and the effect of component subsidence on leg length is considered. Results The average preoperative leg length discrepancy was −6.0 mm, postoperatively +3.6 mm. There was a strong correlation between the CAL measurements and the values on the x-ray (LL, r=0.873, p<0.01; offset, r=0.542, p<0.01). Reliability is better for limb length than for offset. These results are comparable within the literature and the statistical results from other studies reviewed. In addition, we evaluate the importance of subsidence of the prosthesis components for long-term results. Conclusion The intraoperative use of CAL gives excellent results in predicting the final LL and offset after THA. Considering subsidence of prosthesis components, a target zone around +5 mm might be more suitable for leg length directly postoperatively. Moreover, surgeons must discuss the topic of leg length discrepancy (LLD) intensively with the patient pre-operatively. Level of evidence Level 4, prospective cohort studyKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Limb Length Discrepancy Using Pelvic Radiographs: The Most Reproducible MethodHIP International, 2013
- The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantationActa Orthopaedica, 2012
- A comparison of leg length and femoral offset discrepancies in hip resurfacing, large head metal-on- metal and conventional total hip replacement: a case seriesJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2011
- Subsidence of the Corail Femoral Component in the Elderly. A Retrospective Radiological ReviewHIP International, 2011
- Femoral Shortening in Total Hip Arthroplasty for High Developmental Dysplasia of the HipClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: Is C T scan the most accurate option?Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2010
- Primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the lateral Hardinge approach to an anterior mini-invasive approachOrthopedic Reviews, 2009
- Femoral offset: Anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplastyOrthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2009
- Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacementInternational Orthopaedics, 2008
- Leg length discrepancyGait & Posture, 2002