A Practical Approach to Hospital Visitation During a Pandemic: Responding With Compassion to Unjustified Restrictions
Open Access
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by AACN Publishing in American Journal of Critical Care
- Vol. 30 (4), 302-311
- https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2021611
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence-based resources have been sought to support decision-making and strategically inform hospitals’ policies, procedures, and practices. While greatly emphasizing protection, most guiding documents have neglected to support and protect the psychosocial needs of frontline health care workers and patients and their families during provision of palliative and end-of-life care. Consequently, the stage has been set for increased anxiety, moral distress, and moral injury and extreme moral hazard. A family-centered approach to care has been unilaterally relinquished to a secondary and nonessential role during the current crisis. This phenomenon violates a foundational public health principle, namely, to apply the least restrictive means to achieve good for the many. Instead, there has been widespread adoption of utilitarian and paternalistic approaches. In many cases the foundational principles of palliative care have also been neglected. No circumstance, even a global public health emergency, should ever cause health care providers to deny their ethical obligations and human commitment to compassion. The lack of responsive protocols for family visitation, particularly at the end of life, is an important gap in the current recommendations for pandemic triage and contingency planning. A stepwise approach to hospital visitation using a tiered, standardized process for responding to emerging clinical circumstances and individual patients’ needs should be considered, following the principle of proportionality. A contingency plan, based on epidemiological data, is the best strategy to refocus health care ethics in practice now and for the future.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moral Resilience: A Capacity for Navigating Moral Distress in Critical CareAACN Advanced Critical Care, 2016
- Moral distress in intensive care unit professionals is associated with profession, age, and years of experienceJournal of Critical Care, 2015
- Moral Distress in Pediatric Intensive CareJAMA Pediatrics, 2015
- Organizational Influences on Health Professionals’ Experiences of Moral Distress in PICUsHEC Forum, 2015
- Moral injury.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 2014
- Treating Patients as Persons: A Capabilities Approach to Support Delivery of Person-Centered CareAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2013
- Concept Analysis of Good Death in Terminally Ill PatientsAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 2012
- Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experienceInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2011
- The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on medical house staff a qualitative studyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2005
- The promise of a good deathThe Lancet, 1998