Behavioral analysis of mergers and acquisitions decisions
Open Access
- 9 October 2019
- journal article
- Published by Virtus Interpress in Corporate Board: role, duties and composition
- Vol. 15 (3), 8-16
- https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv15i3art1
Abstract
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are among the key strategic decisions that firms make. But the problem is that they often result in failure and impairment loss, with the fair value of the acquisition price becoming an issue that poses the risk of overvaluation. The purpose of this paper is to explain the nature of this risk by shedding light on the errors and biases of decision-making managers and directors and their effect on decision-making processes which involve a high degree of discretion and judgment. The paper finds that biases causing overvaluation include overconfidence by managers; an escalation of bidding prices leading to winner’s curse; anchoring in pricing; the endowment effect; and hindsight and confirmation biases. Corporate governance architecture can be designed to mitigate these biases while preserving the positive aspects of overconfidence, such as its promoting of productive and creative activities and coherent internal management. But it is not a panacea since independent directors also have biases and conflicts of interest inherent in the mechanism. Advancements in the understanding of human emotion and psychology promise to protect shareholders by deepening our understanding of corporate decisions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP19K13811)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives?Journal of Financial Economics, 2013
- Hindsight BiasPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2012
- Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators?The Journal of Finance, 2012
- Monetary Favors and Their Influence on Neural Responses and Revealed PreferenceJournal of Neuroscience, 2010
- Overconfidence in interval estimates: What does expertise buy you?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2008
- Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO HubrisAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1997
- Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review, 1983
- Unrealistic optimism about future life events.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974