Optimizing Retention in a Pragmatic Trial of Community‐Living Older Persons: The STRIDE Study
- 25 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 68 (6), 1242-1249
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16356
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) study is testing the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to prevent serious fall injuries. Our aim was to describe procedures that were implemented to optimize participant retention; report retention yields by age, sex, clinical site, and follow‐up time; provide reasons for study withdrawals; and highlight the successes and lessons learned from the STRIDE retention efforts. DESIGN Pragmatic cluster randomized trial. SETTING A total of 86 primary care practices within 10 US healthcare systems. PARTICIPANTS A total of 5451 community‐living persons, 70 years of age or older, at high risk for serious fall injuries. MEASUREMENTS Study outcomes were collected every 4 months by a central call center. Reconsent was required to extend follow‐up beyond the originally planned 36 months. RESULTS Over a median follow‐up of 3.2 years (interquartile range = 2.8‐3.7 y), 439 (8.1%) participants died and 600 (11.0%) withdrew their consent or did not reconsent to extend follow‐up beyond 36 months, yielding rates (per 100 person‐years) of deaths and withdrawals of 2.6 and 3.6, respectively. The withdrawal rate increased with advancing age, was comparable for men and women, and did not differ much by clinical site. The most common reasons for withdrawal were illness and unable to contact for reconsent at 36 months. Completion of the follow‐up interviews was greater than 93% at each time point. Most participants completed all (71.8%) or all but one (9.2%) of the follow‐up interviews. The most common reason for not completing a follow‐up interview was unable to contact, with rates ranging from 2.8% at 40 months to 4.6% at 20 months. CONCLUSION Completion of the thrice‐yearly follow‐up interviews in STRIDE was high, and retention of participants over 44 months exceeded the original projections. The procedures used in STRIDE, together with lessons learned, should assist other investigators who are planning or conducting large pragmatic trials of vulnerable older persons.Funding Information
- National Center for Research Resources (KL2TR000113, UL1TR000114, UL1TR000142, UL1TR001102)
- National Institute on Aging (K07AG043587, P30AG013679, P30AG021332, P30AG021342, P30AG024824, P30AG024832, P30AG028748, P30AG2874106, U01AG048270)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advance telephone calls ahead of reminder questionnaires increase response rate in non-responders compared to questionnaire reminders only: The RECORD phone trialTrials, 2014
- Prior notification of trial participants by newsletter increased response rates: a randomized controlled trialJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2012
- Item Banks for Measuring Emotional Distress From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): Depression, Anxiety, and AngerAssessment, 2011
- A Road Map for the Recruitment and Retention of Older Adult Participants for Longitudinal StudiesJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010
- Recruitment and Retention of Older Adults in Aging ResearchJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2008
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- Maximizing Clinical Research Participation in Vulnerable Older Persons: Identification of Barriers and MotivatorsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2008
- The effects of an open design on trial participant recruitment, compliance and retention – a randomized controlled trial comparison with a blinded, placebo-controlled designClinical Trials, 2004
- Population-based Cohort StudiesEpidemiologic Reviews, 1998
- Falls Efficacy as a Measure of Fear of FallingJournal of Gerontology, 1990