Motivated Reasoning and Democratic Accountability
- 15 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 116 (2), 751-767
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421001209
Abstract
Does motivated reasoning harm democratic accountability? Substantial evidence from political behavior research indicates that voters have “directional motives” beyond accuracy, which is often taken as evidence that they are ill equipped to hold politicians accountable. We develop a model of electoral accountability with voters as motivated reasoners. Directional motives have two effects: (1) divergence—voters with different preferences hold different beliefs, and (2) desensitization—the relationship between incumbent performance and voter beliefs is weakened. While motivated reasoning does harm accountability, this is generally driven by desensitized voters rather than polarized partisans with politically motivated divergent beliefs. We also analyze the relationship between government performance and vote shares, showing that while motivated reasoning always weakens this relationship, we cannot infer that accountability is also harmed. Finally, we show that our model can be mapped to standard models in which voters are fully Bayesian but have different preferences or information.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retrospective Voting ReconsideredAnnual Review of Political Science, 2013
- Irrelevant events affect voters' evaluations of government performanceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Perception, Memory, and Partisan Polarization on the Iraq WarPolitical Science Quarterly, 2010
- Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil's Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2008
- Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision MakingThe Journal of Politics, 2002
- Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic CitizenshipThe Journal of Politics, 2000
- First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory BiasThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on Presidential Voting, 1956-1988American Journal of Political Science, 1992
- The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Economic Conditions and the Presidential VoteAmerican Political Science Review, 1989