Osmolality-based normalization enhances statistical discrimination of untargeted metabolomic urine analysis: results from a comparative study
- 2 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Metabolomics
- Vol. 17 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-020-01758-z
Abstract
Introduction Because of its ease of collection, urine is one of the most commonly used matrices for metabolomics studies. However, unlike other biofluids, urine exhibits tremendous variability that can introduce confounding inconsistency during result interpretation. Despite many existing techniques to normalize urine samples, there is still no consensus on either which method is most appropriate or how to evaluate these methods. Objectives To investigate the impact of several methods and combinations of methods conventionally used in urine metabolomics on the statistical discrimination of two groups in a simple metabolomics study. Methods We applied 14 different strategies of normalization to forty urine samples analysed by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). To evaluate the impact of these different strategies, we relied on the ability of each method to reduce confounding variability while retaining variability of interest, as well as the predictability of statistical models. Results Among all tested normalization methods, osmolality-based normalization gave the best results. Moreover, we demonstrated that normalization using a specific dilution prior to the analysis outperformed post-acquisition normalization. We also demonstrated that the combination of various normalization methods does not necessarily improve statistical discrimination. Conclusions This study re-emphasized the importance of normalizing urine samples for metabolomics studies. In addition, it appeared that the choice of method had a significant impact on result quality. Consequently, we suggest osmolality-based normalization as the best method for normalizing urine samples. Trial registration number: NCT03335644This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Human Urine MetabolomePLOS ONE, 2013
- Combination of Injection Volume Calibration by Creatinine and MS Signals’ Normalization to Overcome Urine Variability in LC-MS-Based Metabolomics StudiesAnalytical Chemistry, 2013
- Urinary Biomarkers of Meat ConsumptionCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2011
- Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rateKidney International, 2010
- The Nutrinet-Santé Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional statusBMC Public Health, 2010
- Metabolomics Reveals Metabolic Biomarkers of Crohn's DiseasePLOS ONE, 2009
- Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolitesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Proteochemometric modeling of HIV protease susceptibilityBMC Bioinformatics, 2008
- Statistical validation of megavariate effects in ASCABMC Bioinformatics, 2007
- The Scree Test For The Number Of FactorsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1966