Caution in interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 quantification based on RT-PCR cycle threshold value
- 4 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
- Vol. 100 (3), 115366
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115366
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2: quantitative versus qualitativeThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2021
- Comparison of commercial assays and laboratory developed tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2Journal of Virological Methods, 2020
- The duration of infectiousness of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2Journal of Infection, 2020
- Comparison of Four Molecular In Vitro Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR primer-probe setsNature Microbiology, 2020
- Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2JAMA, 2020
- Inappropriate Nasopharyngeal Sampling for SARS‐CoV‐2 Detection Is a Relevant Cause of False‐Negative ReportsOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2020
- Potential False-Negative Nucleic Acid Testing Results for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Thermal Inactivation of Samples with Low Viral LoadsClinical Chemistry, 2020
- Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCREurosurveillance, 2020
- Pitfalls in interpretation of CT-values of RT-PCR in children with acute respiratory tract infectionsJournal of Clinical Virology, 2017