Reassessment of Prostate Biopsy Specimens for Patients Referred for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Rarely Influences Surgical Planning
Open Access
- 27 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in European Urology Open Science
- Vol. 28, 36-42
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.04.003
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review by urological pathologists improves the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologistsBMC Urology, 2015
- Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Efficacy, Limitations, and Complications—A Systematic Review of the LiteratureEuropean Urology, 2013
- Extent of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and the Impact of Standard Template Dissection on Nomogram Prediction of Lymph Node InvolvementEuropean Urology, 2011
- Post‐prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment optionsBJU International, 2011
- Cancer Control and Functional Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy as Markers of Surgical Quality: Analysis of Heterogeneity Between Surgeons at a Single Cancer CenterEuropean Urology, 2011
- Administrative Data Sets are Inaccurate for Assessing Functional Outcomes After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 2011
- Gleason score concordance on biopsy‐confirmed prostate cancer: is pathological re‐evaluation necessary prior to radical prostatectomy?BJU International, 2010
- Should the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer be modified to account for high-grade tertiary components? A systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet Oncology, 2007
- Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Invasion among Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and an Extended Pelvic LymphadenectomyEuropean Urology, 2006
- Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimensVirchows Archiv A Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, 2003