Resistance Training Induces Improvements in Range of Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 January 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Sports Medicine
- Vol. 53 (3), 707-722
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01804-x
Abstract
Background Although it is known that resistance training can be as effective as stretch training to increase joint range of motion, to date no comprehensive meta-analysis has investigated the effects of resistance training on range of motion with all its potential affecting variables. Objective The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of chronic resistance training on range of motion compared either to a control condition or stretch training or to a combination of resistance training and stretch training to stretch training, while assessing moderating variables. Design For the main analysis, a random-effect meta-analysis was used and for the subgroup analysis a mixed-effect model was implemented. Whilst subgroup analyses included sex and participants’ activity levels, meta-regression included age, frequency, and duration of resistance training. Data Sources Following the systematic search in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) and reference lists, 55 studies were found to be eligible. Eligibility Criteria Controlled or randomized controlled trials that separately compared the training effects of resistance training exercises with either a control group, stretching group, or combined stretch and resistance training group on range of motion in healthy participants. Results Resistance training increased range of motion (effect size [ES] = 0.73; p < 0.001) with the exception of no significant range of motion improvement with resistance training using only body mass. There were no significant differences between resistance training versus stretch training (ES = 0.08; p = 0.79) or between resistance training and stretch training versus stretch training alone (ES = − 0.001; p = 0.99). Although “trained or active people” increased range of motion (ES = 0.43; p < 0.001) “untrained and sedentary” individuals had significantly (p = 0.005) higher magnitude range of motion changes (ES = 1.042; p < 0.001). There were no detected differences between sex and contraction type. Meta-regression showed no effect of age, training duration, or frequency. Conclusions As resistance training with external loads can improve range of motion, stretching prior to or after resistance training may not be necessary to enhance flexibility.Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2017-03728)
- Austrian Science Fund (Project J 4484)
- Austrian Science Fund
This publication has 107 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Inter-Set Stretching on Strength, Flexibility and Hormonal AdaptationsJournal of Human Kinetics, 2013
- Resistance Training vs. Static Stretching: Effects on Flexibility and StrengthJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2011
- Influence of the Number of Sets at a Strength Training in the Flexibility GainsJournal of Human Kinetics, 2011
- The Acute Effects of a Warm-Up Including Static or Dynamic Stretching on Countermovement Jump Height, Reaction Time, and FlexibilityJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2011
- Differential adaptations to eccentric versus conventional resistance training in older humansExperimental Physiology, 2009
- Human tendon behaviour and adaptation,in vivoJournal Of Physiology-London, 2008
- A Comparison of Two Warm-Ups on Joint Range of MotionJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2007
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Comparison of 1 and 2 Days per Week of Strength Training in ChildrenResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2002
- Velocity Specificity of Resistance TrainingSports Medicine, 1993