The Effects of Random Stimulation Rate on Measurements of Auditory Brainstem Response
Open Access
- 20 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Vol. 14, 78
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00078
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) signal is an electrophysiological recording from electrodes placed on the scalp to reflect the electrical activities of the brain. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) is one type of EEG signals in response to an auditory stimulus, and it has been widely used to evaluate the potential disorders of the auditory function within the brain. Currently, the ABR measurements in the clinic usually adopt a fixed stimulation rate (FSR) technique in which the late evoked response could contaminate the ABR signals and deteriorate the waveform differentiation after averaging, thus compromising the overall auditory function assessment task. To resolve this issue, this study proposed a random stimulation rate (RSR) method by integrating a random interval between two adjacent stimuli. The results showed that the proposed RSR method was consistently repeatable and reliable in multiple trials of repeated measurements, and there was a large amplitude of successive late evoked response that would contaminate the ABR signals for conventional FSR methods. The ABR waveforms of the RSR method showed better wave I–V morphology across different stimulation rates and stimulus levels, and the improved ABR morphology played an important role in early diagnoses of auditory pathway abnormities. The correlation coefficients as functions of averaging time showed that the ABR waveform of the RSR method stabilizes significantly faster, and therefore, it could be used to speed up current ABR measurements with more reliable testing results. The study suggests that the proposed method would potentially aid the adequate reconstruction of ABR signals towards a more effective means of hearing loss screening, brain function diagnoses, and potential brain–computer interface.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem ResponseAudiology Research, 2014
- Auditory Brainstem Response to Complex Sounds Predicts Self-Reported Speech-in-Noise PerformanceJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2013
- Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing childrenHearing Research, 2012
- Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A TutorialEar & Hearing, 2010
- Brain stem auditory and visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosisActa Neurologica Scandinavica, 2009
- Subcortical Laterality of Speech EncodingAudiology and Neurotology, 2008
- Brainstem encoding of voiced consonant–vowel stop syllablesClinical Neurophysiology, 2008
- Comparison between Auditory Brain Stem Responses Evoked by Rarefaction and Condensation Step Functions and ClicksInternational Journal of Audiology, 1986
- The Effects of Stimulus Rise-Time and Polarity on the Auditory Brainstem ResponsesScandinavian Audiology, 1984