Treatment of acute cardiac tamponade: A retrospective analysis of classical intermittent versus continuous pericardial drainage
Open Access
- 5 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in IJC Heart & Vasculature
- Vol. 32, 100722
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100722
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Undergoing Impella CP Treatment vs. Standard of CareJournal of Clinical Medicine, 2020
- Editorial commentary: Pericardiocentesis: No more a subspecialty technique!Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2019
- Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes of Coronary Perforation During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary InterventionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2017
- Pericardial Effusion and Cardiac Tamponade in the New MillenniumCurrent Cardiology Reports, 2017
- Structure and Anatomy of the Human PericardiumProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 2017
- Pericardial Effusions: Causes, Diagnosis, and ManagementProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 2017
- Post-cardiac injury syndromes. An emerging cause of pericardial diseasesInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2013
- Management of Cardiac Tamponade: A Comperative Study between Echo-Guided Pericardiocentesis and Surgery—A Report of 100 PatientsCardiology Research and Practice, 2011
- Hemodynamic Effects of Volume Expansion in Patients With Cardiac TamponadeCirculation, 2008
- Hemodynamic Effects of Volume Expansion and Nitroprusside Compared with Pericardiocentesis in Patients with Acute Cardiac TamponadeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1982