Safe from Harm? Massive Attack Nuclear Worst-Case Scenario for Civil Protection in Germany Regarding High-Risk Zones of Exposure, Vulnerability, and Safe Havens
Open Access
- 29 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Challenges
- Vol. 13 (2), 47
- https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13020047
Abstract
New risk geographies are emerging with war and conflict resurfacing, including nuclear threats. This poses challenges to civil protection for conducting risk-informed preparedness planning. A spatial assessment of Germany and Europe is conducted using a geographic information system. Buffer circles of nuclear explosion effects and fallout buffers show potentially exposed areas around major cities. Different scenarios indicate shrinking areas safe from exposure. However, even in a densely populated country, rural areas and smaller cities can be identified that could provide sites for evacuation shelters. Changing wind directions poses a challenge for civil protection planning because fallout risk covers most German territory even when few cities are attacked. However, wind speeds and topography can help identify suitable shelter areas. More knowledge about the temporal development of a nuclear explosion and its specific forms of harm can also help to improve risk knowledge and planning. While nuclear warfare at first seems to render useless any option for safe areas and survival, the spatial risk assessment shows that exposure does not occur at all places at all times. Being safe from harm will be difficult in such a worst-case scenario, but avoiding large city perimeters and being informed can also help reduce risk.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global risk of radioactive fallout after major nuclear reactor accidentsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2012
- Vulnerability of populations and the urban health care systems to nuclear weapon attack – examples from four American citiesInternational Journal of Health Geographics, 2007
- Preparing for the Next AttackForeign Affairs, 2001
- Accidental Nuclear War — A Post–Cold War AssessmentThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Perception of RiskScience, 1987
- Our Common Future—Call for ActionEnvironmental Conservation, 1987
- The Consequences of "Limited" Nuclear Attacks on the United StatesInternational Security, 1986
- Launch under AttackScientific American, 1984
- On the geography of a worst case nuclear attack on the population of BritainPolitical Geography Quarterly, 1982
- Limited Nuclear WarScientific American, 1976