Socioeconomic Status, Health and Lifestyle Settings as Psychosocial Risk Factors for Road Crashes in Young People: Assessing the Colombian Case
Open Access
- 19 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (3), 886
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030886
Abstract
The social determinants of health influence both psychosocial risks and protective factors, especially in high-demanding contexts, such as the mobility of drivers and non-drivers. Recent evidence suggests that exploring socioeconomic status (SES), health and lifestyle-related factors might contribute to a better understanding of road traffic crashes (RTCs). Thus, the aim of this study was to construct indices for the assessment of crash rates and mobility patterns among young Colombians who live in the central region of the country. The specific objectives were developing SES, health and lifestyle indices, and assessing the self-reported RTCs and mobility features depending on these indices. A sample of 561 subjects participated in this cross-sectional study. Through a reduction approach of Principal Component Analysis (PCA), three indices were constructed. Mean and frequency differences were contrasted for the self-reported mobility, crash rates, age, and gender. As a result, SES, health and lifestyle indices explained between 56.3–67.9% of the total variance. Drivers and pedestrians who suffered crashes had higher SES. A healthier lifestyle is associated with cycling, but also with suffering more bike crashes; drivers and those reporting traffic crashes have shown greater psychosocial and lifestyle-related risk factors. Regarding gender differences, men are more likely to engage in road activities, as well as to suffer more RTCs. On the other hand, women present lower healthy lifestyle-related indices and a less active implication in mobility. Protective factors such as a high SES and a healthier lifestyle are associated with RTCs suffered by young Colombian road users. Given the differences found in this regard, a gender perspective for understanding RTCs and mobility is highly suggestible, considering that socio-economic gaps seem to differentially affect mobility and crash-related patterns.This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- The gender gap in mobility: A global cross-sectional studyBMC Public Health, 2012
- Social Determinants of Health StatusIssues in Mental Health Nursing, 2012
- A Public Health Perspective of Road Traffic AccidentsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2012
- Gender differences in the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and depressive symptoms in older adultsArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2011
- Sample size calculationInternational Journal of Ayurveda Research, 2010
- Socioeconomic Status and Age Variations in Health-Related Quality of Life: Results From the National Health Measurement StudyThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2009
- Cars, corporations, and commodities: Consequences for the social determinants of healthEmerging Themes in Epidemiology, 2008
- Issues in the construction of wealth indices for the measurement of socio-economic position in low-income countriesEmerging Themes in Epidemiology, 2008
- Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2)Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1)Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006