Biological subphenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome may not reflect differences in alveolar inflammation
Open Access
- 6 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Physiological Reports
- Vol. 9 (3), e14693
- https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14693
Abstract
Biological subphenotypes have been identified in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) based on two parsimonious models: the "uninflamed" and "reactive" subphenotype (cluster-model) and "hypo-inflammatory" and "hyper-inflammatory" (latent class analysis (LCA) model). The distinction between the subphenotypes is mainly driven by inflammatory and coagulation markers in plasma. However, systemic inflammation is not specific for ARDS and it is unknown whether these subphenotypes also reflect differences in the alveolar compartment. Alveolar inflammation and dysbiosis of the lung microbiome have shown to be important mediators in the development of lung injury. This study aimed to determine whether the "reactive" or "hyper-inflammatory" biological subphenotype also had higher concentrations of inflammatory mediators and enrichment of gut-associated bacteria in the lung. Levels of alveolar inflammatory mediators myeloperoxidase (MPO), surfactant protein D (SPD), interleukin (IL)-1b, IL-6, IL-10, IL-8, interferon gamma (IFN), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) were determined in the mini-BAL fluid. Key features of the lung microbiome were measured: bacterial burden (16S rRNA gene copies/ml), community diversity (Shannon Diversity Index), and community composition. No statistically significant differences between the "uninflamed" and "reactive" ARDS subphenotypes were found in a selected set of alveolar inflammatory mediators and key features of the lung microbiome. LCA-derived subphenotypes and stratification based on cause of ARDS (direct vs. indirect) showed similar profiles, suggesting that current subphenotypes may not reflect the alveolar host response. It is important for future research to elucidate the pulmonary biology within each subphenotype properly, which is arguably a target for intervention.Funding Information
- University of Michigan
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lung Microbiota Predict Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2020
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastatin: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2018
- Identification and validation of distinct biological phenotypes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by cluster analysisThorax, 2017
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Subphenotypes Respond Differently to Randomized Fluid Management StrategyAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017
- Enrichment of the lung microbiome with gut bacteria in sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndromeNature Microbiology, 2016
- Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trialsThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2014
- Biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndromeCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2014
- Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeJAMA, 2012
- Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sampleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- What Has Computed Tomography Taught Us about the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome?American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001