Acceptance and adoption of protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of trust in politics and trust in science
Open Access
- 23 December 2020
- journal article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 15 (4), 1-23
- https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.4315
Abstract
The United Nations have described the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as the worst global crisis since the second world war. Behavioral protective measures, such as good hand hygiene and social distancing, may strongly affect infection and fatality rates worldwide. In two studies (total N = 962), we aimed to identify central predictors of acceptance and adoption of protective measures, including sociodemographic variables, risk perception, and trust. We found that men and younger participants show lower acceptance and adoption of protective measures, suggesting that it is crucial to develop targeted health messages for these groups. Moreover, trust in politics and trust in science emerged as important predictors for the acceptance and adoption of protective measures. These results show that maintaining and ideally strengthening trust in politics and trust in science might be central for overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the NetherlandsBMC Public Health, 2011
- Compliance with recommendations for pandemic influenza H1N1 2009: the role of trust and personal beliefsHealth Education Research, 2011
- Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A reviewBritish Journal of Health Psychology, 2010
- Competence‐Based and Integrity‐Based Trust as Predictors of Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS)Risk Analysis, 2009
- Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone surveyBMJ, 2009
- It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationshipsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2008
- An Empirical Test of Competing Theories of Hazard‐Related Trust: The Case of GM FoodRisk Analysis, 2007
- Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the “Deficit Model” of Education and Support for Science and TechnologySocial Science Quarterly, 2001
- Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trustJournal of Risk Research, 1999
- An Integrative Model Of Organizational TrustAcademy of Management Review, 1995