Should RT‐PCR be considered a gold standard in the diagnosis of COVID‐19?
- 14 July 2020
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 92 (11), 2312-2313
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25996
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chest CT in patients suspected of COVID-19 infection: A reliable alternative for RT-PCRThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2020
- Performance of VivaDiag COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test is inadequate for diagnosis of COVID-19 in acute patients referring to emergency room departmentJournal of Medical Virology, 2020
- Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 CasesRadiology, 2020
- Positive rate of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan, China, from Jan to Feb 2020Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2020
- Antibody Detection and Dynamic Characteristics in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patientsJournal of Infection, 2020
- "Gold standard" is an appropriate term.BMJ, 1992
- Time to abolish "gold standard"BMJ, 1992
- Ernest Saunders: diagnostic dilemma.BMJ, 1992
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960