Defining readmissions among patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in claims database analyses
- 7 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 36 (1), 83-89
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1667315
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of using different readmissions definitions among patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the femur, tibia, and fibula in claims databases. Methods: Patients from the IBM MarketScan® Research Commercial and Medicare Databases receiving inpatient ORIF between 1/1/2010-1/31/2017 (index) were identified. Readmissions within 90 days were calculated starting from the index day of discharge to 2 days after discharge. Readmission rates were also reported after accounting for records for rehabilitation, aftercare, or transfer using discharge status, provider type, and Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) codes. For patients with “transferred” as the index hospitalization discharge status, readmissions were calculated 2 days after discharge. Results: A total of 82,692 patients with ORIF for femur, tibia or fibula were identified; mean (SD) age was 60.1 (23.1) years and nearly two-thirds were female (62.3%). For the index hospitalization, 41.6% patients had “transferred” as the discharge status. The readmission rate calculated from the same day as the discharge was 14.7%. Readmission rates calculated 1 and 2 days after index discharge were 8.5% and 7.7%. After accounting for rehabilitation, aftercare and transfer, the corrected readmission rate was 8.6%. Corrected readmission rates calculated 1 and 2 days after index discharge were 7.2% and 7.2%, respectively. The most common diagnosis associated with same day readmission was rehabilitation, whereas that was not observed with readmissions 1 and 2 days after discharge. Conclusions: The accuracy of identifying true admissions was improved by defining readmissions as occurring after the day of discharge and by accounting for rehabilitation, aftercare, and transfer.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital Length of Stay Reduction Over Time and Patient Readmission for Severe Adverse Events Following SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2019
- Defining the role of intramedullary nailing for fractures of the distal radiusThe Bone & Joint Journal, 2015
- Unplanned return to theater: A quality of care and risk management index?Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2015
- Financial Implications of Hospital Readmission After Hip FractureGeriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, 2015
- When projecting required effectiveness of interventions for hospital readmission reduction, the percentage that is potentially avoidable must be consideredJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
- Tibia shaft fractures: costly burden of nonunionsBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2013
- Urgent readmission rates can be used to infer differences in avoidable readmission rates between hospitalsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2012
- A meta‐analysis of hospital 30‐day avoidable readmission ratesJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2011
- Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic reviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2011
- Avoidable readmission in Hong Kong - system, clinician, patient or social factor?BMC Health Services Research, 2010