Comparison of three therapeutic regimens for genotype‐3 hepatitis C virus infection in a large real‐life multicentre cohort
- 22 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Liver International
- Vol. 40 (4), 769-777
- https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14386
Abstract
Background & Aims In the direct‐acting antiviral era, treatment of genotype‐3 HCV (HCV‐GT3) is still challenging. Real‐life comparisons between recommended regimens, sofosbuvir (SOF)+daclatasvir (DAC), SOF/velpatasvir (VEL), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), are scarce. We aimed at filling this data gap. Methods Sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) was assessed for all HCV‐GT3 patients consecutively treated within the Lombardia web‐based Navigatore HCV‐Network; differences in SVR12 across regimens were evaluated by logistic regression. Results Out of 2082 subjects with HCV‐GT3, 1544 were evaluable for comparisons between regimens: SOF+DAC (1023, 66.2%), SOF/VEL (369, 23.9%), GLE/PIB (152, 9.8%). Patients treated with former regimens were more frequently male, cirrhotic, HIV‐positive, pre‐treated, used ribavirin in their regimen, and had lower baseline HCV‐RNA. SVR12 was similar across groups: 94.8% in SOF+DAC, 97.6% in SOF/VEL, 96.7% in GLE/PIB (p=0.065). At univariate analysis SVR12 was associated with female gender (97.9% versus 94.8%, p=0.007) and lower median pre‐treatment Log10HCV‐RNA (5.87 versus 6.20, p=0.001). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, treatment with SOF/VEL was associated with a higher likelihood of SVR12 than SOF+DAC, but only in the absence of ribavirin (98% versus 90.3%). Female gender and lower pre‐treatment HCV‐RNA were independently associated with SVR12. Conclusions In a large real‐life setting of HCV‐GT3‐infected patients with a high proportion of cirrhosis, the success rate was remarkable. The slight advantage of SOF/VEL on SOF+DAC was significant only without ribavirin. The current prescription shift towards novel regimens (i.e. SOF/VEL and GLE/PIB) in easier‐to‐treat patients allows ribavirin‐free and shorter schedules without mining SVR12 in this «difficult‐to‐treat» genotype.Funding Information
- AbbVie
- Gilead Sciences
- Merck Sharp and Dohme
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Daclatasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin for hepatitis C virus genotype 3 and advanced liver disease: A randomized phase III study (ALLY‐3+)Journal of Hepatology, 2016
- Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir for HCV Genotype 2 and 3 InfectionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Sofosbuvir Plus Velpatasvir Combination Therapy for Treatment-Experienced Patients With Genotype 1 or 3 Hepatitis C Virus InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2015
- Sofosbuvir With Velpatasvir in Treatment-Naive Noncirrhotic Patients With Genotype 1 to 6 Hepatitis C Virus InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2015
- EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosisJournal of Hepatology, 2015
- All‐oral 12‐week treatment with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection: ALLY‐3 phase III studyJournal of Hepatology, 2015
- Is genotype 3 of the hepatitis C virus the new villain?Journal of Hepatology, 2014
- Review article: HCV genotype 3 – the new treatment challengeAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2014
- Assessment of Liver Fibrosis by Transient Elastography in Persons with Hepatitis C Virus Infection or HIV–Hepatitis C Virus CoinfectionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Intraobserver and Interobserver Variations in Liver Biopsy Interpretation in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis CJournal of Hepatology, 1994