Contemporary trends in the level of evidence in general thoracic surgery clinical research
- 9 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 61 (5), 1012-1019
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezab460
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The large volume of scientific publications and the increasing emphasis on high-quality evidence for clinical decision-making present daily challenges to all clinicians, including thoracic surgeons. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contemporary trend in the level of evidence (LOE) for thoracic surgery clinical research. METHODS: All clinical research articles published between January 2010 and December 2017 in 3 major general thoracic surgery journals were reviewed. Five authors independently reviewed the abstracts of each publication and assigned a LOE to each of them using the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification scheme. Data extracted from eligible abstracts included study type, study size, country of primary author and type of study designs. Three auditing processes were conducted to establish working definitions and the process was validated with a research methodologist and 2 senior thoracic surgeons. Intra-class correlation coefficient was calculated to assess inter-rater agreement. Chi-square test and Spearman correlation analysis were then used to compare the LOE between journals and by year of publication. RESULTS: Of 2028 publications reviewed and scored, 29 (1.4%) were graded level I, 75 (3.7%) were graded level II, 471 (23.2%) were graded level III, 1420 (70.2%) were graded level IV and 33 (1.6%) were graded level V (lowest level). Most publications (94.9%) were of lower-level evidence (III–V). There was an overall increasing trend in the lower LOE (P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was substantial with 95.5% (95%, confidence interval: 0.95–0.96) level of agreement between reviewers. CONCLUSIONS: General thoracic surgery literature consists mostly of lower LOE studies. The number of lower levels of evidence is dominating the recent publications, potentially indicating a need to increase the commitment to produce and disseminate higher-level evidence in general thoracic surgery.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence in the Aesthetic Surgical Literature over the Past DecadePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
- The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based MedicinePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2011
- Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Guidelines for Assessing Respective Strengths and LimitationsJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2008
- CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2008
- When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noiseBMJ, 2007
- An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence productionNeuroImage, 2006
- Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research DesignsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health careBMJ, 1996
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- Epidemiologic analyses of causation: the unlearned scientific lessons of randomized trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989