Administrative codes inaccurately identify recurrent venous thromboembolism: The CVRN VTE study
- 5 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Thrombosis Research
- Vol. 189, 112-118
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.02.023
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (R01HL103820, U19HL91179, 1K24HL141354)
- Swiss National Science Foundation (P2BEP3_165409)
- Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner foundation
- CSL Behring
- Roche Diagnostics
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (NOACs-1510-32651)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (NOACs-1510-32651)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of hospital readmission in patients diagnosed withDVTandPE: clinical burden of recurrent eventsInternational Journal of Clinical Practice, 2014
- Use of administrative medical databases in population-based research: Table 1Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2013
- The occurrence of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients following major surgeryThrombosis Research, 2013
- Regulatory, policy and quality update for venous thromboembolism and stroke in United States hospitalsThrombosis Research, 2012
- A systematic review of validated methods for identifying venous thromboembolism using administrative and claims dataPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2012
- Evaluation of the predictive value of ICD-9-CM coded administrative data for venous thromboembolism in the United StatesThrombosis Research, 2010
- Call to action to prevent venous thromboembolismJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2009
- The Cardiovascular Research NetworkCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2008
- Venous Thromboembolism in the Outpatient SettingArchives of Internal Medicine, 2007
- The worcester venous thromboembolism studyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006