Harnessing technological solutions for childhood obesity prevention and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current applications
- 24 February 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Journal of Obesity
- Vol. 45 (5), 957-981
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00765-x
Abstract
Background Technology holds promise for delivery of accessible, individualized, and destigmatized obesity prevention and treatment to youth. Objectives This review examined the efficacy of recent technology-based interventions on weight outcomes. Methods Seven databases were searched in April 2020 following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were: participants aged 1–18 y, use of technology in a prevention/treatment intervention for overweight/obesity; weight outcome; randomized controlled trial (RCT); and published after January 2014. Random effects models with inverse variance weighting estimated pooled mean effect sizes separately for treatment and prevention interventions. Meta-regressions examined the effect of technology type (telemedicine or technology-based), technology purpose (stand-alone or adjunct), comparator (active or no-contact control), delivery (to parent, child, or both), study type (pilot or not), child age, and intervention duration. Findings In total, 3406 records were screened for inclusion; 55 studies representing 54 unique RCTs met inclusion criteria. Most (89%) included articles were of high or moderate quality. Thirty studies relied mostly or solely on technology for intervention delivery. Meta-analyses of the 20 prevention RCTs did not show a significant effect of prevention interventions on weight outcomes (d = 0.05, p = 0.52). The pooled mean effect size of n = 32 treatment RCTs showed a small, significant effect on weight outcomes (d = ‒0.13, p = 0.001), although 27 of 33 treatment studies (79%) did not find significant differences between treatment and comparators. There were significantly greater treatment effects on outcomes for pilot interventions, interventions delivered to the child compared to parent-delivered interventions, and as child age increased and intervention duration decreased. No other subgroup analyses were significant. Conclusions Recent technology-based interventions for the treatment of pediatric obesity show small effects on weight; however, evidence is inconclusive on the efficacy of technology based prevention interventions. Research is needed to determine the comparative effectiveness of technology-based interventions to gold-standard interventions and elucidate the potential for mHealth/eHealth to increase scalability and reduce costs while maximizing impact.This publication has 107 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence intervals for the between‐study variance in random effects meta‐analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statisticsResearch Synthesis Methods, 2013
- A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-TherapiesJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2011
- Family-Based Interventions Targeting Childhood Obesity: A Meta-AnalysisChildhood Obesity, 2011
- A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: Is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy?Clinical Psychology Review, 2011
- The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) and the Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART): New Methods for More Potent eHealth InterventionsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007
- Lifestyle interventions in the treatment of childhood overweight: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.Health Psychology, 2007
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986