Comparison of Temporary Epiphysiodesis With RigidTacks™ and Blount‐Staples in a Porcine Animal Model Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Open Access
- 19 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Vol. 38 (5), 946-953
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24532
Abstract
RigidTack™ is a newly developed implant for total temporary epiphyseodesis. The implant combines the technical advantages of the traditionally used rigid Blount‐staples and the newer flexible eight‐plates™. Thus, the implant is rigid like the Blount‐staples, which may be a biomechanical advantage in temporary epiphyseodesis, and has an easy and guided implantation technique like the eight‐plate™. As in eight‐plates™, supposedly only two RigidTacks™ are sufficient for temporary epiphyseodesis compared to six Blount‐staples in traditional treatment. The goal of this study was to compare Blount‐staples and RigidTacks™ in regard to the total potential of growth arrest, the occurrence of postoperative implant‐associated complications, secondary angular deformities, and central joint deformations. Twelve pigs were allocated in two groups (n = 6) for treatment of the proximal tibia. Total temporary epiphysiodesis was performed with either four Blount‐staples or two RigidTacks™. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐scans were performed before and 14 weeks after surgery, and the amount and distribution of growth arrest were evaluated by measuring the interphyseal distance in nine defined zones. Total temporary epiphysiodesis with two RigidTacks™ resulted in a similar amount of growth arrest as that of four Blount‐staples. No significant coronal or sagittal angular deformities or joint deformities were observed in either group; however, one secondary loosening of a Blount‐staple occurred. The study concluded that Blount‐staples and RigidTacks™ are adequate implants for total temporary epiphysiodesis. Whether or not the precise implant‐placement through the guided implantation technique of RigidTacks™ and a reduced number of implants indeed lead to a reduction of secondary angular deformities has to be investigated in further clinical trials. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 38:946‐953, 2020Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporary epiphyseodesis for limb-length discrepancyActa Orthopaedica, 2014
- Guided Growth for the Treatment of Moderate Leg-length DiscrepancyOrthopedics, 2013
- Mechanical Axis Following Staple Epiphysiodesis for Limb-Length InequalityJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009
- Physeal Stapling Versus 8-plate Hemiepiphysiodesis for Guided Correction of Angular Deformity about the KneeJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2009
- Failure of Orthofix eight-Plate for the Treatment of Blount DiseaseJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2009
- Guided Growth for Angular CorrectionJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2007
- Leg-length discrepancy. Indication for equalization and importance of shortening proceduresDer Orthopäde, 2000
- Percutaneous Epiphysiodesis Using Transphyseal Screws (PETS)Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 1998
- Percutaneous EpiphyseodesisJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 1994
- CONTROL OF BONE GROWTH BY EPIPHYSEAL STAPLINGThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1949