Chinese only children and loneliness: Stereotypes and realities.
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
- Vol. 91 (4), 531-544
- https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000554
Abstract
Popularmedia has aroused concern that Chinese only children are growing up lonely owing to their lack of sibling interaction Mu et al. (2007). However, little research has been directed at determining whether Chinese adults believe in the only-child-as-lonely stereotype and whether Chinese only children actually suffer more loneliness than their peers with siblings. Three studies were conducted to examine belief in the only-child-as-lonely stereotype and determine whether only children report greater loneliness than children with siblings. With the first study, the prevalence of the only-child-as-lonely stereotype among young adults from six cities (Study 1, N = 588) was examined. The results showed that belief in this stereotypical perception was common among young Chinese adults, particularly those who had siblings. We then examined the validity of this stereotype by analyzing data from three samples, consisting of Chinese emerging adults (Study 2, N = 699) and late adolescents (Studies 3.1 and 3.2, N = 345 and 210, respectively). Results from Studies 2 and 3 consistently showed that, contrary to the stereotype, Chinese only children reported lower levels of loneliness than their counterparts with siblings. Additionally, open-ended responses from the adolescent participants in Study 3 provided hints about the situations that provoke their loneliness. The results are explained in terms of the two theoretical approaches to loneliness. In sum, our research suggests that belief in the loneliness of only children is widespread in Chinese society, but the evidence indicates that reports of loneliness are greater for those who grew up with siblings.Keywords
Funding Information
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD042849; T32HD007081)
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population, Policy, and Politics: How Will History Judge China's One‐Child Policy?Population and Development Review, 2013
- ‘Only children’ and their coalition of parents: Considering grandparents and parents as joint caregivers in urban Xiamen, ChinaAsian Journal of Social Psychology, 2010
- Sibling Relationships During the Transition to AdulthoodChild Development Perspectives, 2010
- Women, Loneliness, and Incident Coronary Heart DiseasePsychosomatic Medicine, 2009
- Psychometric analysis of the short-form UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) in Taiwanese undergraduate studentsPersonality and Individual Differences, 2008
- Predictors and subjective causes of loneliness in an aged populationArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2005
- Loneliness, Social Network Size, and Immune Response to Influenza Vaccination in College Freshmen.Health Psychology, 2005
- Measurement and Validity Characteristics of the Short Version of the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for AdultsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2004
- What causes birth order-intelligence patterns? The admixture hypothesis, revived.American Psychologist, 2001
- The Academic, Personality, and Physical Outcomes of Only Children in ChinaChild Development, 1993