Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review
Open Access
- 15 September 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Primary Health Care Research & Development
Abstract
Aim: We conducted an integrative review of the global-free maternity (FM) policies and evaluated the quality of care (QoC) and cost and cost implications to provide lessons for universal health coverage (UHC). Methodology: Using integrative review methods proposed by Whittemore and Knafl (2005), we searched through EBSCO Host, ArticleFirst, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Emerald Insight, JSTOR, PubMed, Springer Link, Electronic collections online, and Google Scholar databases guided by the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PRISMA) guideline. Only empirical studies that described FM policies with components of quality and cost were included. There were 43 papers included, and the data were analysed thematically. Results: Forty-three studies that met the criteria were all from developing countries and had implemented different approaches of FM policy. Review findings demonstrated that some of the quality issues hindering the policies were poor management of complications, worsened referral systems, overburdening of staff because of increased utilisation, lack of transport, and low supply of stock. There were some quality improvements on monitoring vital signs by nurses and some procedures met the recommended standards. Equally, mothers still bear the burden of some costs such as the purchase of drugs, transport, informal payments despite policies being ‘free’. Conclusions: FM policies can reduce the financial burden on the households if well implemented and sustainably funded. Besides, they may also contribute to a decline in inequity between the rich and poor though not independently. In order to achieve the SDG goal of UHC by 2030, there is a need to promote awareness of the policy to the poor and disadvantaged women in rural areas to help narrow the inequality gap on utilisation and provide a sustainable form of transport through collaboration with partners to help reduce impoverishment of households. Also, there is a need to address elements such as cultural barriers and the role of traditional birth attendants which hinder women from seeking skilled care even when they are freely available.Keywords
This publication has 93 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychometric properties of the Swedish childbirth self-efficacy inventory (Swe-CBSEI)BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014
- Why do women pay more than they should? A mixed methods study of the implementation gap in a policy to subsidize the costs of deliveries in Burkina FasoEvaluation and Program Planning, 2013
- User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementationBMC Health Services Research, 2012
- Transversal analysis of public policies on user fees exemptions in six West African countriesBMC Health Services Research, 2012
- A literature review of the disruptive effects of user fee exemption policies on health systemsBMC Public Health, 2012
- Fee exemption for caesarean section in MoroccoArchives of Public Health, 2012
- Removing user fees for basic health services: a pilot study and national roll-out in AfghanistanHealth Policy and Planning, 2011
- Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5The Lancet, 2010
- Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service useBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2009
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988