Clinical Prediction of Coronavirus Disease-2019: How Accurate Can One Be?
Open Access
- 6 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Cureus
- Vol. 12 (12)
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11936
Abstract
Some models based on clinical information have been reported to predict which patients have Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia but have failed so far to yield reliable results. We aimed to determine if physicians were able to accurately predict which patients, as described in clinical vignettes, had, or did not have this infection using their clinical acumen and epidemiological data. Of 1177 patients under investigation for COVID-19 admitted, we selected 20 and presented them in a vignette form. We surveyed physicians from different levels of training (<5, and five or more years after graduation from medical school) and included non-medical participants as a control group. We asked all participants to predict the result of the PCR test for COVID-19. We measured the accuracy of responses as a whole, and at three stages of the pandemic associated with a growing incidence of COVID-19 in the community. We calculated the inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the clinical prediction as a whole and by pandemic stage. Between June 8 and August 28, 2020, 82 doctors and 20 non-medical participants completed the survey. The accuracy was 58% (59% for doctors and 52% for non-medical, p=0.002). The lowest accuracy was noted for cases in the pandemic middle stage; years of post-graduate training represented no difference. Of the 2040 total answers, 1176 were accurate and 864 inaccurate (349 false positives and 515 false negatives). The influence of symptomatic positivity, confirmation bias, and rapid expertise acquisition on accuracy is discussed, as the disease is new, time after graduation made no difference in the response accuracy. The limited clinical diagnostic capacity emphasizes the need for a reliable diagnostic test.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Salivary Detection of COVID-19Annals of Internal Medicine, 2021
- Individualizing Risk Prediction for Positive Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing Results From 11,672 PatientsSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2020
- Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2JAMA, 2020
- Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisalBMJ, 2020
- COVID‐19 transmission through asymptomatic carriers is a challenge to containmentInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2020
- Expertise in evidence-based medicine: a tale of three modelsPhilosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2018
- Cognitive Bias and the Creation and Translation of Evidence Into Clinical PracticeAdvances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 2016
- Does Prevalence Matter to Physicians in Estimating Post-test Probability of Disease? A Randomized TrialJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Simplifying likelihood ratiosJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2002