Learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children: how to reach a level of excellence?
- 24 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Robotic Surgery
- Vol. 15 (1), 93-97
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01082-7
Abstract
It has been suggested that up to 40 cases of RALP are required to reach the operative results equal to open surgery. We have hypothesized that previous experience in open and laparoscopic surgeries might shorten the learning curve of robotic surgery. We have retrospectively evaluated the data of all children who underwent pyeloplasty in our institute by a single surgeon since 2003. The children were divided into three groups: open pyeloplasty (OP) of 72 children, laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LAP) of 22, and RALP of 33 patients subsequently. The data included: demographics, duration of surgery, length of stay, success of surgery, and complication rate according to the Clavien–Dindo score. The groups were ordered chronologically by the operation date and each group was divided into two different phases: early and late. A comparison was made between the data of the early and the late phase. There was no difference in the demographic data between the groups; however, the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were significantly older compared with the patients from the other groups. The median duration of surgery in the RALP group was significantly shorter than the OP group (65 min vs 72.5 min P < 0.01), while the first RALP case was already shorter than the median duration of surgery in OP group. There was no significant decrease in the duration of surgery of the RALP group over the study period, though there was a significant trend of decreasing operative time in the OP and LAP groups. There was no difference in the length of stay in the early vs late phases in the RALP group. There was no difference in the complication and success rate between the RALP and OP group, as well as the early and late phases of the RALP group. Our data show that previous experience in OP and LAP surgery may contribute to a shorter learning curve of robotic surgery required for the surgeon to achieve a similar outcome to that of OP.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Urology robotic journey: demonstrating the learning curve in robot-assisted pyeloplasties (RALP)Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery, 2019
- Surgical decision-making in infants with suspected UPJ obstruction: stakeholder perspectivesJournal of Pediatric Urology, 2019
- Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?Pediatric Surgery International, 2019
- The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a multi-outcome approachJournal of Pediatric Urology, 2018
- Learning curve evaluation using cumulative summation analysis—a clinical example of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplastyJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2015
- Learning Curve of Robotic Assisted Pyeloplasty for Pediatric Urology FellowsJournal of Urology, 2013
- Comparison of the Learning Curve and Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Pediatric PyeloplastyJournal of Urology, 2011
- The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosisJournal of Pediatric Urology, 2010
- Conservative Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children with Antenatal Diagnosis of Hydronephrosis: Lessons Learned after 16 Years of Follow-UpEuropean Urology, 2006
- Pediatric Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Comparison With a Cohort of Open SurgeryJournal of Urology, 2006