Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS): A pictorial essay of common artifacts and benign and malignant pathology
Open Access
- 1 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medical Communications Sp. z.o.o. in Journal of Ultrasonography
- Vol. 22 (91), 222-235
- https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2022.0037
Abstract
Automated breast ultrasound is a three-dimensional ultrasonographic technique allowing the evaluation of women with dense glandular breast tissue. In this group of patients, mammography has a low sensitivity because dense breasts can obscure breast cancer on mammogram. On the other hand, women with dense breast tissue, types C and D on the BI-RADS scale, are at an increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to women with fatty breast tissue. Automated breast ultrasound is a standardized and reproducible ultrasound technique which improves breast cancer detection and is promising in the screening and diagnostic settings: it increases the detection of breast cancer, and helps to differentiate benign and malignant lesions. Unfortunately, automated breast ultrasound also has its limitations and disadvantages due to artifacts caused by poor positioning, and lesion and patient characteristics. Many artifacts can be avoided by training and experience of the performing technician. Furthermore, familiarity of the interpreting breast radiologist with these artifacts and pitfalls will decrease false negative diagnosis of true lesions. Automated breast ultrasound is a three-dimensional ultrasonographic technique allowing the evaluation of women with dense glandular breast tissue. In this group of patients, mammography has a low sensitivity because dense breasts can obscure breast cancer on mammogram. On the other hand, women with dense breast tissue, types C and D on the BI-RADS scale, are at increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to women with fatty breast tissue. Automated breast ultrasound is a standardized and reproducible ultrasound technique which improves breast cancer detection and is promising in the screening and diagnostic settings: it increases the detection of breast cancer, and helps to differentiate benign and malignant lesions. Unfortunately, automated breast ultrasound also has its limitations and disadvantages due to artifacts caused by poor positioning, and lesion and patient characteristics. Many artifacts can be avoided by training and experience of the performing technician. Furthermore, familiarity of the interpreting breast radiologist with these artifacts and pitfalls will decrease false negative diagnosis of true lesions.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Study of Automated Breast 3-D Ultrasound and Handheld B-Mode Ultrasound for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast MassesJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013
- Assessing the Role of Ultrasound in Predicting the Biological Behavior of Breast CancerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2013
- Sonographic Appearance of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast According to Histologic GradeAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2012
- Nonmalignant Breast Papillary Lesions at Core-Needle Biopsy: A Meta-analysis of Underestimation and Influencing FactorsAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2012
- Improved Image Quality in Dual-Energy Abdominal CT: Comparison of Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space and Filtered Back Projection ReconstructionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2012
- Sonographic correlations with the new molecular classification of invasive breast cancerEuropean Radiology, 2009
- Uncommon breast tumors in perspective: Incidence, treatment and survival in the NetherlandsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance ConsortiumCancer, 2006
- All radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions seen on breast screening mammograms should be excisedEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2005
- Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005