General Versus Neuraxial Anesthesia for Appendectomy: A Multicenter International Study
- 7 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 45 (11), 3295-3301
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05978-9
Abstract
Background In resource-limited countries, open appendectomy is still performed under general anesthesia (GA) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA). We sought to compare the postoperative outcomes of appendectomy under NA versus GA. Methods We conducted a post hoc analysis of the International Patterns of Opioid Prescribing (iPOP) multicenter study. All patients ≥ 16 years-old who underwent an open appendectomy between October 2016 and March 2017 in one of the 14 participating hospitals were included. Patients were stratified into two groups: NA—defined as spinal or epidural—and GA. All-cause morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), and pain severity were assessed using univariate analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression adjusting for the following preoperative characteristics: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, history of opioid use, emergency status, and country. Results A total of 655 patients were included, 353 of which were in the NA group and 302 in the GA group. The countries operating under NA were Colombia (39%), Thailand (31%), China (23%), and Brazil (7%). Overall, NA patients were younger (mean age (SD): 34.5 (14.4) vs. 40.7 (17.9), p-value < 0.001) and had a lower BMI (mean (SD): 23.5 (3.8) vs. 24.3 (5.2), p-value = 0.040) than GA patients. On multivariable analysis, NA was independently associated with less postoperative complications (OR, 95% CI: 0.30 [0.10–0.94]) and shorter hospital LOS (LOS > 3 days, OR, 95% CI: 0.47 [0.32–0.68]) compared to GA. There was no difference in postoperative pain severity between the two techniques. Conclusions Open appendectomy performed under NA is associated with improved outcomes compared to that performed under GA. Further randomized controlled studies should examine the safety and value of NA in lower abdominal surgery.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences in Short-Term Complications Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Primary Total Knee ArthroplastyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2013
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised studyJournal of Minimal Access Surgery, 2013
- Combined spinal epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: A case seriesSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 2012
- Spinal vs General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic CholecystectomyArchives of Surgery, 2008
- Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair under epidural anesthesia: a detailed evaluationSurgical Endoscopy, 2006
- Association of Postoperative Complications with Hospital Costs and Length of Stay in a Tertiary Care CenterJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care centerJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Laparoscopic Versus Open AppendectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomisedBMJ, 2000
- Analysis of the Hemodynamic and Ventilatory Effects of Laparoscopic CholecystectomyArchives of Surgery, 1991