Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury
- 28 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Neurology
- Vol. 95 (24), e3412-e3419
- https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000010950
Abstract
Objective To explore the hypothesis that earlier administration of acute gabapentinoids is beneficial to motor recovery after spinal cord injury in humans. Methods This is an observational study using a cohort from the European Multi-Centre Study about Spinal Cord Injury. Patient charts were reviewed to extract information regarding the administration and timing of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants. The primary outcome measure was motor scores, as measured by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, collected longitudinally in the first year after injury. Sensory scores (light touch and pinprick) and functional measures (Spinal Cord Independence Measure) were secondary outcomes. Linear mixed effects regression models included a drug-by-time interaction to determine whether exposure to gabapentinoids altered recovery of muscle strength in the first year after injury. Results A total of 201 participants were included in the study and had a median age of 46 and baseline motor score of 50. Participants were mostly men (85%) with sensory and motor complete injuries (50%). Seventy individuals (35%) were administered gabapentinoids within the first 30 days after injury, and presented with similar demographics. In the longitudinal model, the administration of gabapentinoids within 30 days after injury was associated with improved motor recovery when compared to those who did not receive gabapentinoids during this time (3.69 additional motor points from 4 to 48 weeks after injury; p = 0.03). This effect size increased as administration occurred earlier after injury (i.e., a benefit of 4.68 points when administered within 5 days). Conclusions This retrospective, observational study provided evidence of the beneficial effect of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants on motor recovery after spinal cord injury. More critically, it highlighted a potential time dependence, suggesting that earlier intervention is associated with better outcomes. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that gabapentinoids improve motor recovery for individuals with acute spinal cord injury.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combination therapies in the CNS: Engineering the environmentNeuroscience Letters, 2012
- Results of a phase II placebo-controlled randomized trial of minocycline in acute spinal cord injuryBrain, 2012
- Axonal growth therapeutics: regeneration or sprouting or plasticity?Trends in Neurosciences, 2008
- Pregabalin as a neuroprotector after spinal cord injury in ratsEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international studyDisability and Rehabilitation, 2007
- Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measuresSpinal Cord, 2006
- Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trialsSpinal Cord, 2006
- Results of Multivariable Logistic Regression, Propensity Matching, Propensity Adjustment, and Propensity-based Weighting under Conditions of Nonuniform EffectAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Administration of Methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 Hours or Tirilazad Mesylate for 48 Hours in the Treatment of Acute Spinal Cord InjuryJAMA, 1997
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord InjuryThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1990