Participants Attrition in a Longitudinal Study: The Malaysian Cohort Study Experience
Open Access
- 6 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (14), 7216
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147216
Abstract
The attrition rate of longitudinal study participation remains a challenge. To date, the Malaysian Cohort (TMC) study follow-up rate was only 42.7%. This study objective is to identify the cause of attrition among TMC participants and the measures to curb it. A total of 19,343 TMC participants from Kuala Lumpur and Selangor that was due for follow-up were studied. The two most common attrition reasons are undergoing medical treatment at another government or private health center (7.0%) and loss of interest in participating in the TMC project (5.1%). Those who were inclined to drop out were mostly Chinese, aged 50 years and above, unemployed, and had comorbidities during the baseline recruitment. We have also contacted 2183 participants for the home recruitment follow-up, and about 10.9% agreed to join. Home recruitment slightly improved the overall follow-up rate from 42.7% to 43.5% during the three-month study period.Funding Information
- Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (PDE48)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to Establish and Follow up a Large Prospective Cohort Study in the 21st Century - Lessons from UK COSMOSPLOS ONE, 2015
- Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in ThailandBMC Research Notes, 2011
- Loss to Follow-Up in Cohort Studies: How Much is Too Much?European Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- Attrition in longitudinal population studies: Does it affect the generalizability of the findings?: An introduction to the seriesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2002
- Underestimation of Mortality Following Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Resulting From Incomplete Follow-upSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2001
- Elderly cohort study subjects unable to return for follow-up have lower bone mass than those who can return.American Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- A dilemma in analysis: issues in the serial measurement of quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancerLung Cancer, 1997
- Mortality and Cancer Rates in Nonrespondents to a Prospective Study of Older Women: 5-Year Follow-upAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- SELECTION BIAS IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES12American Journal of Epidemiology, 1981
- RESPONSE AND FOLLOW-UP BIAS IN COHORT STUDIESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1977