Digital Models for the Analysis of Little’s Irregularity Index in Subjects with a Different Degree of Crowding: A Reproducibility Study
Open Access
- 12 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 10 (20), 7108
- https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207108
Abstract
Background: To investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of digital measurements of Little’s Irregularity Index and to evaluate if different degrees of dental crowding could influence these measurements. Methods: The study included 40 dental models and 5 sub-groups were created according to the severity of the crowding. In both the digital models and the study cast, Little’s Irregularity Index was recorded by measuring (1) the mesiodistal width of each tooth and (2) the arch lengths in both the maxillary and mandibular jaw. Two operators performed measurements on plaster and digital models using, respectively, a digital caliper and OrthoAnalyzerTM 3D software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). Statistical analysis was performed to assess intra- and inter-operator variability, the accuracy between manual and digital measurements and if the amount of crowding could affect the accuracy of the digital measurements. Results: Concerning intra-examiner reliability, no statistically significant differences were detected (p > 0.05). In the maxillary and mandibular arch, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) value was 0.996 and 0.997 for the analogic measurements and 0.998 and 0.978 for the digital measurements. For the maxillary arch, the mean difference between the analogic and digital Little’s Irregularity Index (LII) measurements was 0.43 mm while for the mandibular arch the mean difference was 0.24 mm, showing some overestimation of the digital measurements (p < 0.05). No differences were found according to crowding subgroups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Digital measurements of LII could be considered as a valid substitute of the gold standard analogical measurement.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodological accuracy of digital and manual model analysis in orthodontics – A retrospective clinical studyComputers in Biology and Medicine, 2015
- The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital modelsJournal of Dentistry, 2014
- Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital modelsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2013
- Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?Journal of Dentistry, 2013
- Analysis of the characteristics of slot design affecting resistance to sliding during active archwire configurationsProgress in Orthodontics, 2013
- Differential expression of transglutaminase genes in patients with chronic periodontitisOral Diseases, 2013
- Using Little's Irregularity Index in orthodontics: Outdated and inaccurate?Journal of Dentistry, 2012
- Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: Comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurementsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2006
- Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital modelsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2005
- The Irregularity Index: A quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1975