Risk disclosure and firm risk: Evidence from Canadian firms
Open Access
- 22 January 2020
- journal article
- Published by Virtus Interpress in Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets & Institutions
- Vol. 10 (1), 52-60
- https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv10i1p4
Abstract
In recent decades, financial and accounting regulators have turned the spotlight on risk management and disclosure. Like securities regulators in the United States, the United Kingdom and several other countries, Canadian Securities Administrators have set out requirements for the disclosure and discussion of risks in the MD&A section of annual reports. Responding positively to these new guidelines, organisations now report many risks in their MD&A. These disclosure requirements are intended to provide information about a company’s material risks to help stakeholders understand and evaluate interrelated risks, the risks’ impact and the company’s risk management strategies (Khandelwal, Kumar, Verma, & Pratap Singh, 2019). However, since the nature of the risks disclosed derives wholly from organisational decisions, the content of these disclosures can be considered voluntary. For this reason, some critics argue that risk disclosures are by and large boilerplate in nature (Bao & Datta, 2014; Hope, Hu, & Lu, 2016). From this perspective, this study aims to examine whether there is a relationship between the risks firms disclose in their annual reports and their systematic risk. The regression analyses were carried out on the risks disclosed by a sample of 200 Canadian companies included in the 2016 Toronto Stock Exchange S&P/TSX Composite Index. These analyses revealed a positive and significant relationship between the risks disclosed and the firms’ systematic risk. Our results support the regulatory approaches respecting this type of information adopted by a number of countries. Accordingly, disclosing the risks that companies face should help small investors understand and appreciate them.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The benefits of specific risk-factor disclosuresReview of Accounting Studies, 2016
- Corporate Governance, Risk Disclosure Practices, and Market Liquidity: Comparative Evidence from the UK and ItalyCorporate Governance: An International Review, 2014
- Simultaneously Discovering and Quantifying Risk Types from Textual Risk DisclosuresManagement Science, 2014
- The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filingsReview of Accounting Studies, 2013
- Striving for Legitimacy Through Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights from Oil CompaniesJournal of Business Ethics, 2012
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust BarrierManagement Science, 2011
- One Report: Bringing Change in Corporate Reporting through integration of Financial and Non-Financial Performance DisclosureInternational Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2011
- The effect of investor sophistication on the influence of nonfinancial performance indicators on investors’ judgmentsAccounting & Finance, 2010
- The Relationship Between Market And Accounting Determined Risk Measures: Reviewing And Updating The Beaver, Kettler, Scholes (1970) StudyCollege Teaching Methods & Styles Journal (CTMS), 2009
- Disclosure of market risk or accounting measures of risk: an empirical studyManagerial Auditing Journal, 2005