Comparing SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Anterior Nasal Vestibular Swabs vs. Oropharyngeal Swabs
Open Access
- 7 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
- Vol. 11, 653794
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.653794
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 testing in specimens collected from the anterior nasal vestibules of COVID-19 patients. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on 30 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from March 14, 2020 to March 21, 2020. Paired specimens were collected from both the anterior nasal vestibule and the oropharynx from all patients. All specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. Results: Of the 30 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 17 patients (56.7%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 when oropharyngeal specimens were used, while 20 patients (66.7%) tested positive when nasal swab specimens were used. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity between the two methods. Conclusions: Respiratory swabs collected from the nasal vestibule offer a less invasive alternative to oropharyngeal swabs for specimen collection in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and have adequate sensitivity.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated anosmiaScience Advances, 2020
- Nasal Swab Sampling for SARS-CoV-2: a Convenient Alternative in Times of Nasopharyngeal Swab ShortageJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genesNature Medicine, 2020
- SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical SpecimensJAMA, 2020
- Department of ErrorThe Lancet, 2020
- Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, ChinaThe Lancet, 2020
- A comparison of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabbing for the detection of influenza virus by real-time PCREuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2012
- Detection of multiple respiratory pathogens during primary respiratory infection: nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate using real-time polymerase chain reactionEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Comparing Nose-Throat Swabs and Nasopharyngeal Aspirates Collected From Children With Symptoms for Respiratory Virus Identification Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionPEDIATRICS, 2008