Impact of advance directives on the variability between intensivists in the decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment
Open Access
- 2 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Critical Care
- Vol. 24 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03402-7
Abstract
There is wide variability between intensivists in the decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment (DFLST). Advance directives (ADs) allow patients to communicate their end-of-life wishes to physicians. We assessed whether ADs reduced variability in DFLSTs between intensivists. We conducted a multicenter, prospective, simulation study. Eight patients expressed their wishes in ADs after being informed about DFLSTs by an intensivist-investigator. The participating intensivists answered ten questions about the DFLSTs of each patient in two scenarios, referring to patients’ characteristics without ADs (round 1) and then with (round 2). DFLST score ranged from 0 (no-DFLST) to 10 (DFLST for all questions). The main outcome was variability in DFLSTs between intensivists, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD). A total of 19,680 decisions made by 123 intensivists from 27 ICUs were analyzed. The DFLST score was higher with ADs than without (6.02 95% CI [5.85; 6.19] vs 4.92 95% CI [4.75; 5.10], p < 0.001). High inter-intensivist variability did not change with ADs (RSD: 0.56 (round 1) vs 0.46 (round 2), p = 0.84). Inter-intensivist agreement on DFLSTs was weak with ADs (intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.28). No factor associated with DFLSTs was identified. A qualitative analysis of ADs showed focus on end-of-life wills, unwanted things and fear of pain. ADs increased the DFLST rate but did not reduce variability between the intensivists. In the decision-making process using ADs, the intensivist’s decision took priority. Further research is needed to improve the matching of the physicians’ decision with the patient’s wishes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03013530. Registered 6 January 2017; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03013530.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- A history of resolving conflicts over end-of-life care in intensive care units in the United States*Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Advance Directives and Outcomes of Surrogate Decision Making before DeathThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Using simulation to isolate physician variation in intensive care unit admission decision making for critically ill elders with end-stage cancer: A pilot feasibility study*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Surrogate decision makers for incompetent ICU patients: a European perspectiveCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2008
- Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS StudyIntensive Care Medicine, 2007
- Assessment of Patients' Competence to Consent to TreatmentThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Ability of family members to predict patient's consent to critical care researchIntensive Care Medicine, 2007
- End-of-life decisions: a cohort study of the withdrawal of all active treatment in intensive care units in the United KingdomIntensive Care Medicine, 2005
- Profiles of PyelonephritisArchives of Internal Medicine, 1962