The impact of key audit matter (KAM) disclosure in audit reports on stakeholders’ reactions: a literature review
Open Access
- 4 September 2019
- journal article
- Published by LLC CPC Business Perspectives in Problems and Perspectives in Management
- Vol. 17 (3), 323-341
- https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.26
Abstract
This article presents a literature review of 49 empirical studies on key audit matter (KAM) disclosure in audit reports. The study involves a structured literature review on KAM disclosure based on the reactions of stakeholders. The limitations of former studies and useful recommendations for research are stressed. Five major streams of empirical research that analyze the impact of KAM disclosure on stakeholders’ reactions are focused: (1) shareholders (e.g. investors’ perceptions of auditors’ responsibility and litigation, value relevance and investors’ decisions); (2) debtholders (e.g. loan contracting terms); (3) external auditors (e.g. audit processes and audit fees); (4) boards of directors (e.g. earnings management); and (5) other stakeholders (e.g. informational value for suppliers and customers). The authors stress that most of the included studies use experimental or archival data and analyze the impact of KAM disclosure on investor reactions in a US-American setting. As the international standard setters assume a positive impact of KAM on stakeholder reactions, mixed empirical results are found. Although there are some indications of decreased earnings management behavior, most studies find no significant changes in auditor behavior. Furthermore, there are many insignificant results with regard to shareholders’ reaction in line with our stakeholder and behavioral agency framework. The literature review is especially useful for management decisions, because firm reputation may be positively or negatively influenced by KAM regulations.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- The ISA 700 Auditor's Report and the Audit Expectation Gap – Do Explanations Matter?International Journal of Auditing, 2012
- Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequencesJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2010
- On the use of instrumental variables in accounting researchJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2010
- A Review of Australian Audit Pricing LiteratureAccounting Research Journal, 2005
- The expectation gap in auditingManagerial Auditing Journal, 1998
- A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk TakingAcademy of Management Review, 1998
- Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some EvidenceThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- The Auditor As an Economic AgentJournal of Accounting Research, 1982
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976