A comparative study of the lengths of different reconstruction routes used after thoracic esophagectomy
- 19 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Esophagus
- Vol. 18 (3), 468-474
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00805-x
Abstract
Background A challenge in esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy is that the distance from the neck to the abdomen must be replaced with a long segment obtained from the gastrointestinal tract. The success or failure of the reconstruction depends on the blood flow to the reconstructed organ and the tension on the anastomotic site, both of which depend on the reconstruction distance. There are three possible esophageal reconstruction routes: posterior mediastinal, retrosternal, and subcutaneous. However, there is still no consensus as to which route is the shortest. Methods The length of each reconstruction route was retrospectively compared using measurements obtained during surgery, where the strategy was to pull up the gastric conduit through the shortest route. The proximal reference point was defined as the left inferior border of the cricoid cartilage and the distal reference point was defined as the superior border of the duodenum arising from the head of the pancreas. Results This study involved 112 Japanese patients with esophageal cancer (102 men, 10 women). The mean distances of the posterior mediastinal, retrosternal, and subcutaneous routes were 34.7 ± 2.37 cm, 32.4 ± 2.24 cm, and 36.3 ± 2.27 cm, respectively. The retrosternal route was significantly shorter than the other two routes (both p < 0.0001) and shorter by 2.31 cm on average than the posterior mediastinal route. The retrosternal route was longer than the posterior mediastinal route in only 5 patients, with a difference of less than 1 cm. Conclusion The retrosternal route was the shortest for esophageal reconstruction in living Japanese patients.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Esophageal reconstruction: posterior mediastinal or retrosternal routeJournal of Surgical Research, 2016
- A Risk Model for Esophagectomy Using Data of 5354 Patients Included in a Japanese Nationwide Web-Based DatabaseAnnals of Surgery, 2014
- Tubular stomach or whole stomach for esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal approach: a comparative clinical study on anastomotic leakageIrish Journal of Medical Science, 2013
- Reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Retrosternal or posterior mediastinal route?Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 2011
- Is anterior mediastinum route a shorter choice for esophageal reconstruction? A comparative anatomic studyEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Anterior Versus Posterior Routes of Reconstruction After Esophagectomy: A Comparative Anatomic StudyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2009
- Comparative anatomical study of the anterior and posterior mediastinum as access routes after esophagectomyDiseases of the Esophagus, 2003
- A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of route of reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancerThe American Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Randomized comparison of prevertebral and retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction after resection of oesophageal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: A reviewThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995