Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Vol. 122 (5), 873-893
- https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000260
Abstract
Sexual harassment is pervasive and has adverse effects on its victims, yet perceiving sexual harassment is wrought with ambiguity, making harassment difficult to identify and understand. Eleven preregistered, multimethod experiments (total N = 4,065 participants) investigated the nature of perceiving sexual harassment by testing whether perceptions of sexual harassment and its impact are facilitated when harassing behaviors target those who fit with the prototype of women (e.g., those who have feminine features, interests, and characteristics) relative to those who fit less well with this prototype. Studies A1-A5 demonstrate that participants' mental representation of sexual harassment targets overlapped with the prototypes of women as assessed through participant-generated drawings, face selection tasks, reverse correlation, and self-report measures. In Studies B1-B4, participants were less likely to label incidents as sexual harassment when they targeted nonprototypical women compared with prototypical women. In Studies C1 and C2, participants perceived sexual harassment claims to be less credible and the harassment itself to be less psychologically harmful when the victims were nonprototypical women rather than prototypical women. This research offers theoretical and methodological advances to the study of sexual harassment through social cognition and prototypicality perspectives, and it has implications for harassment reporting and litigation as well as the realization of fundamental civil rights. For materials, data, and preregistrations of all studies, see https://osf.io/xehu9/.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (1844359)
- Center for Health and Wellbeing at Princeton University
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychological Injuries and Legal Decision Making in Civil Cases: What We Know and What We Do not KnowPsychological Injury and Law, 2013
- Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype contentFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Perceptions of sexual assault: expectancies regarding the emotional response of a rape victim over timePsychology, Crime & Law, 2012
- Judgments of Sexual Assault: The Impact of Complainant Emotional Demeanor, Gender, and Victim StereotypesNew Criminal Law Review, 2010
- Sexual Harassment at Work: A Decade (Plus) of ProgressJournal of Management, 2009
- Iron ladies, men of steel: The effects of gender stereotyping on the perception of male and female candidates are moderated by prototypicalityEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2008
- Sensation seeking and men's face preferencesEvolution and Human Behavior, 2007
- Harassment Based on Sex: Protecting Social Status in the Context of Gender HierarchyAcademy of Management Review, 2007
- Reactions to Counterstereotypic Behavior: The Role of Backlash in Cultural Stereotype Maintenance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004
- An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.American Psychologist, 2001