An international comparison of factors affecting quality of life among patients with congestive heart failure: A cross-sectional study
Open Access
- 8 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (4), e0231346
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231346
Abstract
To explore associations among twenty formal and informal, societal and individual-level factors and quality of life (QOL) among people living with congestive heart failure (CHF) in two settings with different healthcare and social care systems and sociocultural contexts. We recruited 367 adult patients with CHF from a single heart failure clinic within two countries with different national social to healthcare spending ratios: Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States (US), and Nijmegen, Netherlands (NL). Cross-sectional survey study. We adapted the Social Quality Model (SQM) to organize twenty diverse factors into four categories: Living Conditions (formal-societal: e.g., housing, education), Social Embeddedness (informal-societal: e.g., social support, trust), Societal Embeddedness (formal-individual: e.g., access to care, legal aid), and Self-Regulation (informal-individual: e.g., physical health, resilience). We developed a survey comprising validated instruments to assess each factor. We administered the survey in-person or by mail between March 2017 and August 2018. We used Cantril’s Self-Anchoring Scale to assess overall QOL. We used backwards stepwise regression to identify factors within each SQM category that were independently associated with QOL among US and NL participants (p<0.05). We then identified factors independently associated with QOL across all categories (p<0.05). 367 CHF patients from the US (32%) and NL (68%) participated. Among US participants, financial status, receiving legal aid or housing assistance, and resilience were associated with QOL, and together explained 49% of the variance in QOL; among NL participants, financial status, perceived physical health, independence in activities of daily living, and resilience were associated with QOL, and explained 53% of the variance in QOL. Four formal and informal factors explained approximately half of the variance in QOL among patients with CHF in the US and NL.Funding Information
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (73156)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encountersPatient Education and Counseling, 2013
- Social support, depression, and heart disease: a ten year literature reviewFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Social Quality: A Way to Measure the Quality of SocietySocial Indicators Research, 2011
- Health and social services expenditures: associations with health outcomesBMJ Quality & Safety, 2011
- Lack of Social Support in the Etiology and the Prognosis of Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPsychosomatic Medicine, 2010
- Examining Resilience of Quality of Life in the Face of Health-Related and Psychosocial Adversity at Older Ages: What is "Right" About the Way We Age?The Gerontologist, 2009
- Literature Review of Methods to Translate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires for Use in Multinational Clinical TrialsValue in Health, 2008
- The wealth of nations revisited: Income and quality of lifeSocial Indicators Research, 1995
- Variations in Social Support Associated with Gender, Ethnicity, and AgeJournal of Social Issues, 1985
- The Pattern of Human ConcernsBritish Journal of Sociology, 1967