Barriers to implementing the International Integrated Reporting Framework
Top Cited Papers
- 2 October 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Emerald in Meditari Accountancy Research
- Vol. 25 (4), 461-480
- https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-05-2017-0150
Abstract
Purpose This paper is motivated by the call for feedback by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) from all stakeholders with knowledge of the International Integrated Reporting Framework () and specifically of the enablers, incentives and barriers to its implementation. The paper synthesises insights from contemporary accounting research into integrated reporting (IR) as a general concept and as espoused by the IIRC in the (IIRC, 2013). The authors specifically focus on possible barriers and emphasise the specific issues the authors feel could be rectified to advance the , along with the areas that may potentially hinder its wider adoption and implementation. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws upon and synthesises academic analysis and insights provided in the IR and academic literature as well as various directives, policy and framework pronouncements. Findings The flexibility and lack of prescription concerning actual disclosures and metrics in the could allow it to be used for compliance, regardless of the other benefits lauded by the IIRC. Thus the authors see forces, both external and internal, driving adoption, with one prominent example being the European Union Directive on non-financial reporting. Because of the different ways in which IR is understood and enacted, there are numerous theoretical and empirical challenges for academics. The authors paper highlights potential areas for further robust academic research and the need to contribute to policy and practice. Research limitations/implications The paper provides the IIRC, academics, regulators and reporting organisations with insights into current practice and the . The authors highlight the need for further development and evidence to help inform improvements both from a policy and a practice perspective. A key limitation of the authors’ work is that the authors draw upon a synthesis of the existing literature which is still in an early stage of development. Originality/value The paper provides the IIRC with several insights into the current and specifically with the enablers, incentives and barriers to its implementation. Also, it provides academic researchers with a number of important observations and an agenda upon which the authors can build their future research.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: a new revolution?Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 2016
- Integrated reporting: background, measurement issues, approaches and an agenda for future researchAccounting & Finance, 2016
- Value relevance of accounting information under an integrated reporting approach: A research noteJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2016
- In Pursuit of a ‘Single Source of Truth’: from Threatened Legitimacy to Integrated ReportingJournal of Business Ethics, 2015
- The International Integrated Reporting Council: A call to actionCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 2015
- Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future researchAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2014
- Exploring the Strategic Integration of Sustainability Initiatives: Opportunities for Accounting ResearchAccounting Horizons, 2012
- Grand theories as barriers to using IC conceptsJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2012
- Management accounting and value creation: the profit and loss of reificationCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 2005
- IntroductionAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2002