Critical thinking about three meta-analyses: can vitamin D alone or with calcium prevent fractures?
- 19 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 36 (3), 497-501
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1687432
Abstract
Critical thinking is crucially important in both research and practice. This article demonstrates that a lack of critical thinking in two meta-analyses resulted in a conclusion that contradicts another meta-analysis and popular opinions. Kahwati et al. and Zhao et al. drew a conclusion that “Vitamin D supplementation alone or with calcium was not associated with reduced fracture incidence among community-dwelling adults without known vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis, or prior fracture”, which apparently contradicted that of Tang et al. Kahwati et al. and Zhao et al. meta-analyzed vitamin D and/or calcium supplementation, which can decrease fracture risk factors, in a population with no known disorders of bone metabolism or vitamin D deficiency. They concluded that supplementation did not reduce fracture incidence. It is important to note that osteoporosis, which supplementation can prevent, and fractures are two distinct concepts. Zhao et al. presented their conclusion without including the conditions under which their conclusion was true. Subsequently, their conclusion was misleadingly interpreted by the public media as “Vitamin D and Calcium Don’t Prevent Bone Fractures” and “Vitamin D Does Not Prevent Falls, Calcium Does Not Prevent Fractures—A $2 Billion Waste of Money”. If study conclusions do not specify the applicable conditions, guidelines on medications, including supplements, are clinically unacceptable. Researchers must critically think about every step of their studies, including the way their conclusions are presented.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- A brief history of FRAXArchives of Osteoporosis, 2018
- Vitamin D, Calcium, or Combined Supplementation for the Primary Prevention of Fractures in Community-Dwelling AdultsJAMA, 2018
- Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among US adults: prevalence, predictors and clinical implicationsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2018
- Association Between Calcium or Vitamin D Supplementation and Fracture Incidence in Community-Dwelling Older AdultsJAMA, 2017
- The Recent Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Low Bone Mass in the United States Based on Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck or Lumbar SpineJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2014
- The use of calcium and vitamin D in the management of osteoporosisTherapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2008
- Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2007
- Risk Factors for Fracture in Nonosteoporotic Men and WomenJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2007
- Effect of Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Density in Men and Women 65 Years of Age or OlderThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Risk factors for hip fracture in european women: The MEDOS studyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1995