Ethical and Regulatory Issues for Embedded Pragmatic Trials Involving People Living with Dementia
Open Access
- 26 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 68 (S2), S37-S42
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16620
Abstract
Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) present an opportunity to improve care for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners, but they also generate a complex constellation of ethical and regulatory challenges. These challenges begin with participant identification. Interventions may be delivered in ways that make it difficult to identify who is a human subject and therefore who needs ethical and regulatory protections. The need for informed consent, a core human subjects protection, must be considered but can be in tension with the goals of pragmatic research design. Thus it is essential to consider whether a waiver or alteration of informed consent is justifiable. If informed consent is needed, the question arises of how it should be obtained because researchers must acknowledge the vulnerability of PLWD due in part to diminished capacity and also to increased dependence on others. Further, researchers should recognize that many sites where ePCTs are conducted will be unfamiliar with human subjects research regulations and ethics. In this report, the Regulation and Ethics Core of the National Institute on Aging Imbedded Pragmatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (AD/ADRD) Clinical Trials (IMPACT) Collaboratory discusses key ethical and regulatory challenges for ePCTs in PLWD. A central thesis is that researchers should strive to anticipate and address these challenges early in the design of their ePCTs as a means of both ensuring compliance and advancing science. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:S37–S42, 2020.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethics and Regulatory Complexities for Pragmatic Clinical TrialsJAMA, 2014
- Informed Consent, Comparative Effectiveness, and Learning Health CareThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical EthicsHastings Center Report, 2013
- The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized TrialsPLoS Medicine, 2012
- Who is the research subject in cluster randomized trials in health research?Trials, 2011
- Seeking Assent and Respecting Dissent in Dementia ResearchAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2010
- Assessment of Patients' Competence to Consent to TreatmentThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Research Consent for Cognitively Impaired AdultsAlzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 2004
- Research Involving Cognitively Impaired AdultsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?JAMA, 2000