Born to fail: flaws in replication design produce intended results
Open Access
- 26 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medicine
- Vol. 18 (1), 1-3
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01517-w
Abstract
We recently published in BMC Medicine an evaluation of the comparative diagnostic performance of InSilicoVA, a software to map the underlying causes of death from verbal autopsy interviews. The developers of this software claim to have failed to replicate our results and appear to have also failed to locate our replication archive for this work. In this Correspondence, we provide feedback on how this might have been done more usefully and offer some suggestions to improve future attempts at reproducible research. We also offer an alternative interpretation of the results presented by Li et al., namely that, out of 100 verbal autopsy interviews, InSilicoVA will, at best, correctly identify the underlying cause of death in 40 cases and incorrectly in 60 – a markedly inferior performance to alternative existing approaches.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-confirming replication of “Performance of InSilicoVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards,” by Flaxman et al.BMC Medicine, 2020
- Performance of InSilicoVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standardsBMC Medicine, 2018
- Improving performance of the Tariff Method for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsiesBMC Medicine, 2015
- Using verbal autopsy to measure causes of death: the comparative performance of existing methodsBMC Medicine, 2014
- Performance of physician-certified verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standardsPopulation Health Metrics, 2011
- Robust metrics for assessing the performance of different verbal autopsy cause assignment methods in validation studiesPopulation Health Metrics, 2011
- An invitation to reproducible computational researchBiostatistics, 2010