Coronary artery bypass surgery versus medical therapy alone for ischaemic heart disease
- 10 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Emergencias
- Vol. 2020 (6)
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013645
Abstract
Objectives This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of coronary artery bypass surgery versus medical therapy alone in people with ischaemic heart disease.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of Therapeutic Benefit from Revascularization in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic DysfunctionCirculation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013
- 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic SurgeonsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011
- A Randomized Trial of Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Age cut-off for the loss of benefit from bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting☆European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Medication nonadherence is associated with a broad range of adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery diseaseAmerican Heart Journal, 2008
- Cardiac syndrome X: a critical overview and future perspectivesHeart, 2005
- Clinically important differences in health status for patients with heart disease: an expert consensus panel reportAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists CollaborationThe Lancet, 1994
- Progress Study of 590 Consecutive Nonsurgical Cases of Coronary Disease Followed 5-9 YearsCirculation, 1973